• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis does not lead to an increase in high risk sex behaviors in men who have sex with men participating in the EXPLORE trial.使用非职业性接触后预防并不会导致参加 EXPLORE 试验的男男性行为者增加高危性行为。
AIDS Behav. 2010 Oct;14(5):1182-9. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9712-1.
2
Subsequent HIV infection among men who have sex with men who used non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis at a Boston community health center: 1997-2013.1997年至2013年期间,在波士顿一家社区健康中心使用非职业性暴露后预防药物的男男性行为者中后续感染艾滋病毒的情况。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015 Jan;29(1):20-5. doi: 10.1089/apc.2014.0154.
3
Awareness and use of nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Vancouver, Canada.加拿大温哥华男男性行为者对非职业性暴露后预防的认知与使用情况
HIV Med. 2016 Oct;17(9):662-73. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12369. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
HIV Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Global Data.男男性行为人群中的 HIV 非职业暴露后预防:全球数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2020 May;34(5):193-204. doi: 10.1089/apc.2019.0313.
5
Characteristics, sexual practices and sexually transmissible infections diagnoses of men who have sex with men and use non-occupational HIV post-exposure prophylaxis in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州男男性行为者的特征、性行为及性传播感染诊断情况,以及他们使用非职业性HIV暴露后预防措施的情况。
Sex Health. 2016 Nov;13(6):555-559. doi: 10.1071/SH16092.
6
Awareness of post-exposure HIV prophylaxis in high-risk men who have sex with men in New York City.在纽约市,与男性发生性行为的高危男性对艾滋病毒暴露后预防的认知。
Sex Transm Infect. 2011 Jun;87(4):344-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.2010.046284. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
7
Examining potential effects of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) on sexual behaviors of Chinese men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional study.探讨非职业性暴露后预防(nPEP)对中国男男性行为者性行为的潜在影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;21(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10283-0.
8
HIV infection and risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among injecting drug users -- National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, 20 U.S. cities, 2009.HIV 感染者和风险、预防、以及注射吸毒者的检测行为——全国 HIV 行为监测系统,2009 年,美国 20 个城市。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Jul 4;63(6):1-51.
9
Transitioning to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) from Non-Occupational Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) in a Comprehensive HIV Prevention Clinic: A Prospective Cohort Study.在一家综合性艾滋病预防诊所中,从非职业性暴露后预防(nPEP)过渡到艾滋病病毒暴露前预防(PrEP):一项前瞻性队列研究。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015 Aug;29(8):431-6. doi: 10.1089/apc.2015.0014. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
10
Nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV after sexual intercourse among women in Brazil: Risk profiles and predictors of loss to follow-up.巴西女性性交后非职业性HIV暴露后预防:风险概况及失访预测因素
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17071. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017071.

引用本文的文献

1
Can HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Services Change the Sexual Behavior Characteristics of Men Who Have Sex with Men? A Cohort Study in Guangzhou, China.艾滋病病毒暴露后预防服务能否改变男男性行为者的性行为特征?一项在中国广州开展的队列研究。
AIDS Behav. 2025 Apr;29(4):1305-1315. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04604-8. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Missed Opportunities: A Narrative Review on Why Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Is Underutilized.错失的机会:关于为何未充分利用非职业性HIV暴露后预防的叙述性综述。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 15;11(8):ofae332. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae332. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Risk perception and usage of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis among fisherfolk in Ggulwe parish on the shores of Lake Victoria in central Uganda.乌干达维多利亚湖岸边 Ggulwe 教区渔民对非职业性接触后预防的风险认知和使用情况。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 8;11:1116317. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1116317. eCollection 2023.
4
The Use of HIV Pre- and Postexposure Prophylaxis Among a Web-Based Sample of HIV-Negative and Unknown Status Cisgender and Transgender Sexual Minority Men: Cross-sectional Study.基于网络的 HIV 阴性和未知 HIV 状态的 cisgender 和 transgender 性少数男性群体中 HIV 暴露前和暴露后预防的使用:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Dec 16;8(12):e31237. doi: 10.2196/31237.
5
Implementation of HIV non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men in 2 cities of Southwestern China.中国西南 2 城市男男性行为者 HIV 非职业暴露后预防实施情况
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Oct 29;100(43):e27563. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027563.
6
Awareness and use of nonoccupational HIV post-exposure prophylaxis and factors associated with awareness among MSM in Beijing, China.中国北京男男性行为者对非职业性 HIV 暴露后预防的知晓和使用情况,以及与知晓情况相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0255108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255108. eCollection 2021.
7
Service acceptance of HIV non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis(nPEP) among college students: a cross-sectional study in China.中国大学生对HIV非职业性暴露后预防(nPEP)的服务接受情况:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):1220. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11286-7.
8
Applying a Nursing Perspective to Address the Challenges Experienced by Cisgender Women in the HIV Status Neutral Care Continuum: A Review of the Literature.从护理角度出发解决 HIV 状态中性关怀连续体中 cisgender 女性所面临的挑战:文献综述。
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2021;32(3):283-305. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000243.
9
Examining potential effects of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) on sexual behaviors of Chinese men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional study.探讨非职业性暴露后预防(nPEP)对中国男男性行为者性行为的潜在影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;21(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10283-0.
10
"It's Like Plan B but for HIV!" Design and Evaluation of a Media Campaign to Drive Demand for PEP.“这就像是 HIV 的‘事后避孕药’!”PEP 需求推动的媒体宣传活动的设计与评估。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Dec;24(12):3337-3345. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02906-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Limited knowledge and use of HIV post- and pre-exposure prophylaxis among gay and bisexual men.男同性恋者和双性恋男性对艾滋病毒暴露后和暴露前预防的了解及使用情况有限。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Feb 1;47(2):241-7.
2
Tenofovir DF plus lamivudine or emtricitabine for nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (NPEP) in a Boston Community Health Center.在波士顿社区健康中心使用替诺福韦酯联合拉米夫定或恩曲他滨进行非职业性暴露后预防(NPEP)。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Apr 1;47(4):494-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318162afcb.
3
Determinants of high-risk sexual behavior during post-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV infection.暴露后预防以预防HIV感染期间高危性行为的决定因素。
AIDS Behav. 2008 Nov;12(6):852-9. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9286-8. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
4
Narrative review: antiretroviral therapy to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV-1.叙述性综述:抗逆转录病毒疗法预防HIV-1性传播
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 17;146(8):591-601. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-8-200704170-00010.
5
HIV postexposure prophylaxis in sexual assault: current practice and patient adherence to treatment recommendations in a large urban teaching hospital.性侵犯后HIV暴露后预防:大型城市教学医院的当前实践及患者对治疗建议的依从性
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;12(7):640-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.01.015.
6
Antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection-drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV in the United States: recommendations from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.美国性接触、注射吸毒或其他非职业性接触艾滋病毒后的抗逆转录病毒暴露后预防:美国卫生与公众服务部的建议
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005 Jan 21;54(RR-2):1-20.
7
Effects of a behavioural intervention to reduce acquisition of HIV infection among men who have sex with men: the EXPLORE randomised controlled study.一项行为干预措施对降低男男性行为者感染艾滋病毒几率的影响:探索随机对照研究
Lancet. 2004;364(9428):41-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16588-4.
8
Determinants of enrollment in a preventive HIV vaccine trial: hypothetical versus actual willingness and barriers to participation.预防性HIV疫苗试验的入组决定因素:假设意愿与实际意愿及参与障碍
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004 May 1;36(1):604-12. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200405010-00009.
9
Use of postexposure prophylaxis against HIV infection following sexual exposure does not lead to increases in high-risk behavior.性接触暴露后使用预防艾滋病病毒感染的暴露后预防措施不会导致高危行为增加。
AIDS. 2004 Mar 26;18(5):787-92. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200403260-00010.
10
Behavioral impact, acceptability, and HIV incidence among homosexual men with access to postexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004 Apr 15;35(5):519-25. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200404150-00010.

使用非职业性接触后预防并不会导致参加 EXPLORE 试验的男男性行为者增加高危性行为。

Use of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis does not lead to an increase in high risk sex behaviors in men who have sex with men participating in the EXPLORE trial.

机构信息

Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Ctr, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2010 Oct;14(5):1182-9. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9712-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10461-010-9712-1
PMID:20490908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2944957/
Abstract

Non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) use is an HIV prevention strategy that has been recommended by the CDC to prevent HIV infection after a high risk sexual exposure since 1997. In a behavioral intervention trial of 4,295 MSM we assessed perceptions and use of nPEP over 4 years in six cities across the United States. Overall, 1.9% of MSM reported use of nPEP prior to enrollment, and 6.3% at least once during the trial. Awareness of nPEP was reported by 47.5%, with higher awareness in two sites with funded nPEP programs. Three seroconversions occurred in the 384 visits where nPEP courses were reported, with no effect of nPEP on risk of HIV acquisition in this cohort (hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [0.29, 2.86]). NPEP users were a riskier group: increased odds of nPEP use were observed in association with multiple partners and unprotected receptive and insertive anal sex with HIV infected partners and partners with unknown HIV status. NPEP use was also associated with use of illicit drugs (injection drugs, crack cocaine, hallucinogens, and amphetamines). Importantly, willingness to use nPEP after high risk sex was associated with lower odds of high risk sex. After an episode of nPEP use, nPEP users remained more likely to report high risk sex than those in this cohort who had not previously used nPEP. However, within the subset of people who had previously reported high risk sex, previous nPEP use was not associated with higher odds of high risk sex, thus allaying fears that availability of nPEP would lead to an increase in high risk sex.

摘要

非职业性暴露后预防(nPEP)的使用是一种艾滋病毒预防策略,自 1997 年以来,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)建议在高危性行为后使用 nPEP 来预防艾滋病毒感染。在一项针对 4295 名男男性行为者(MSM)的行为干预试验中,我们评估了他们在美国六个城市的四年间对 nPEP 的认知和使用情况。总体而言,1.9%的 MSM 在入组前报告使用过 nPEP,6.3%的 MSM 在试验期间至少使用过一次。47.5%的人报告知晓 nPEP,在有资金支持的 nPEP 项目的两个地点,知晓率更高。在报告使用 nPEP 课程的 384 次就诊中,有 3 例发生血清转换,但 nPEP 对该队列中 HIV 感染风险没有影响(风险比=0.91,95%置信区间[0.29, 2.86])。nPEP 用户是一个风险更高的群体:与多个性伴侣发生无保护的接受性和插入性肛交,以及与 HIV 感染者和未知 HIV 状态的伴侣发生无保护的肛交,使用 nPEP 的几率增加。nPEP 的使用还与非法药物(注射毒品、快克可卡因、迷幻剂和安非他命)的使用有关。重要的是,在高危性行为后愿意使用 nPEP 与较低的高危性行为几率相关。在使用 nPEP 后,nPEP 用户比该队列中以前未使用过 nPEP 的人更有可能报告高危性行为。然而,在以前报告过高危性行为的人群中,以前使用 nPEP 与更高的高危性行为几率无关,从而消除了人们对 nPEP 供应会导致高危性行为增加的担忧。