Mennucci Benedetta, Claps Michele, Evidente Antonio, Rosini Carlo
Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università di Pisa, via Risorgimento 35, 56100 Pisa, Italy.
J Org Chem. 2007 Aug 31;72(18):6680-91. doi: 10.1021/jo070806i. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
The optical rotatory power of some natural cyclohexene oxides, such as (+)-chaloxone, 1, (+)-epiepoformine, 2, (+)-epoformine, 3, (+)-epoxidone, 5, (-)-sphaeropsidone, 6, (-)-episphaeropsidone, 7, and the synthetic compound (+)-epitheobroxide, 4, has been calculated by means of the TDDFT/B3LYP method using the 6-31G(d) and aug-cc-pVDZ basis sets, both in the gas phase and in solution by means of the polarizable continuum model. For compounds 1 and 2, which possess high (about 300 units) optical rotations, gas-phase calculations with the smaller basis set are able to reproduce the experimental values both in sign and order of magnitude. By contrast, a larger basis set is required to satisfactorily simulate the OR values of 3 and 4, which show smaller (about 100 units or less) rotations. The inclusion of the solvent effects is different for different compounds; for 1 and 2, it leads to a better agreement between experiment and prediction, while for 3 and 4, the presence of hydrogen bonding groups makes the application of continuum solvation models less satisfactory. For the flexible system 5, the absolute configuration could not be determined using gas-phase calculations and the smaller basis set, but both inclusion of solvent and larger basis set effects are compulsory. It is noteworthy that calculations both in the gas phase and in the solvent lead to a positive rotatory power for the laevorotatory natural compounds 6 and 7 if the ACs reported in the literature are employed to do the theoretical prediction. This strongly indicates that the ACs previously assigned to these compounds in the literature are not correct and that the TDDFT prediction of OR values has become by now a practicable tool for AC assignments.
一些天然环己烯氧化物,如(+)-chaloxone(1)、(+)-表环氧甲酰吗啉(2)、(+)-环氧甲酰吗啉(3)、(+)-环氧二酮(5)、(-)-球毛壳菌素(6)、(-)-表球毛壳菌素(7)以及合成化合物(+)-表可可碱氧化物(4)的旋光能力,已通过TDDFT/B3LYP方法,使用6-31G(d)和aug-cc-pVDZ基组,在气相和溶液中借助极化连续介质模型进行了计算。对于具有高旋光度(约300单位)的化合物1和2,使用较小基组的气相计算能够在符号和量级上重现实验值。相比之下,需要更大的基组才能令人满意地模拟旋光度较小(约100单位或更小)的化合物3和4的旋光值。不同化合物对溶剂效应的包含情况不同;对于化合物1和2,这导致实验与预测之间的一致性更好,而对于化合物3和4,氢键基团的存在使得连续溶剂化模型的应用不太令人满意。对于柔性体系5,使用气相计算和较小基组无法确定绝对构型,但同时包含溶剂和更大基组效应是必要的。值得注意的是,如果采用文献中报道的绝对构型进行理论预测,气相和溶剂中的计算都表明左旋天然化合物6和7具有正旋光能力。这强烈表明文献中先前赋予这些化合物的绝对构型是不正确的,并且旋光值的TDDFT预测现已成为确定绝对构型的实用工具。