Becker Stefanie I
Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):764-87. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.764.
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether costs invoked by the presence of an irrelevant singleton distractor in a visual search task are due to attentional capture by the irrelevant singleton or spatially unrelated filtering costs. Measures of spatial effects were based on distance effects, compatibility effects, and differences between singleton and nonsingleton target trials. The results show that the distractor only regularly captures attention when it is nonpredictive of the target position and unpredictably changes its features. When the distractor is antipredictive of the target position and the irrelevant features of target and distractor remain constant throughout the experiment, spatially unrelated filtering costs prevail. Further experiments showed that filtering costs accrue from distractor inhibition or target activation processes, which in turn can be modeled as instances of priming of pop-out. The present study thus clarifies the notion of filtering costs and modifies present accounts of the distraction effect. Moreover, the results also relate to research of intertrial priming by showing that priming affects the stage of attentional selection and depends on top-down attentional control settings.
本研究的目的是调查在视觉搜索任务中,无关单例干扰项的存在所引发的成本是由于无关单例对注意力的捕获,还是空间上不相关的过滤成本。空间效应的测量基于距离效应、兼容性效应以及单例目标试验和非单例目标试验之间的差异。结果表明,只有当干扰项对目标位置无预测性且不可预测地改变其特征时,它才会经常捕获注意力。当干扰项对目标位置具有反预测性且目标和干扰项的无关特征在整个实验过程中保持不变时,空间上不相关的过滤成本占主导。进一步的实验表明,过滤成本源于干扰项抑制或目标激活过程,反过来,这些过程可以被建模为弹出式启动的实例。因此,本研究阐明了过滤成本的概念,并修正了当前对分心效应的解释。此外,研究结果还与试验间启动的研究相关,表明启动会影响注意力选择阶段,并取决于自上而下的注意力控制设置。