• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特征和维度的试验间效应能否由单一理论来解释?

Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?

作者信息

Becker Stefanie I

机构信息

University of Bielefeld.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1417-40. doi: 10.1037/a0011386.

DOI:10.1037/a0011386
PMID:19045983
Abstract

This study investigated feature- and dimension-based intertrial effects in visual search for a pop-out target. The 2 prominent theories explaining intertrial effects, priming of pop-out and dimension weighting, both assume that repeating the target from the previous trial facilitates attention shifts to the target, whereas changing the target leads to attentional switch costs. In contrast, the results from the present study indicate that intertrial effects from changing features and dimensions involve different underlying mechanisms: Eye movement recordings showed that feature priming reliably modulates the speed of visually selecting the target, whereas changing the target dimension interferes only with processes after selection of the search target. Further experiments with a size and orientation singleton target showed that feature priming does not consist in carryover effects of target activation or nontarget inhibition, contrary to standard assumptions in visual search. Instead, priming effects critically depended on whether a coarse relation between target and nontarget features (e.g., smaller or larger) was repeated or reversed across trials. These results suggest the need to modify current models of priming in visual search.

摘要

本研究调查了视觉搜索弹出式目标时基于特征和维度的试验间效应。解释试验间效应的两个主要理论,即弹出式启动和维度加权,都假定重复前一次试验中的目标有助于将注意力转移到该目标上,而改变目标则会导致注意力转换成本。相比之下,本研究的结果表明,特征和维度变化所产生的试验间效应涉及不同的潜在机制:眼动记录显示,特征启动可靠地调节了视觉选择目标的速度,而改变目标维度仅干扰搜索目标选择后的过程。对大小和方向单一目标进行的进一步实验表明,与视觉搜索中的标准假设相反,特征启动并非由目标激活或非目标抑制的遗留效应组成。相反,启动效应关键取决于目标与非目标特征之间的粗略关系(例如,更小或更大)在各试验间是重复还是反转。这些结果表明有必要修改当前视觉搜索中的启动模型。

相似文献

1
Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?特征和维度的试验间效应能否由单一理论来解释?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1417-40. doi: 10.1037/a0011386.
2
The role of within-dimension singleton priming in visual search.视觉搜索中维度内单例启动的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Apr;34(2):268-85. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.268.
3
The stage of priming: are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional?启动阶段:试验间重复效应是注意力方面的还是决策方面的?
Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(5):664-84. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.025. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
4
The mechanism of priming: episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out?启动机制:情景检索还是突显启动?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):324-39. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.005. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.目标-干扰物关系在视觉搜索中引导注意和眼睛的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 May;139(2):247-65. doi: 10.1037/a0018808.
6
Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.跨维度对单一特征目标的视觉搜索:维度加权中刺激驱动和预期驱动的效应
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):1021-35. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1021.
7
Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?凸显启动的机制:存储表征还是特征增益调制?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Jul;71(5):1059-71. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1059.
8
Emotional priming of pop-out in visual search.视觉搜索中弹出式的情绪启动
Emotion. 2008 Apr;8(2):151-61. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.151.
9
A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.联合搜索中启动效应的特征加权解释。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):258-72. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.258.
10
Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search.视觉搜索试验间启动中的情景检索与特征促进
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1350-60. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0119-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Eyes on the past: Gaze stability differs between temporal expectation and temporal attention.回顾过去:时间预期与时间注意力之间的注视稳定性存在差异。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 8:2024.06.07.598015. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.07.598015.
2
Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.在同时进行的视觉工作记忆负荷下,抑制作用继续指导搜索。
J Vis. 2022 Feb 1;22(2):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.2.8.
3
Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.特征性试次间启动会引导注意力吗?尚无定论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):369-393. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01997-8. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
4
Predicting how surface texture and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention.预测人类视觉系统如何将表面纹理和形状结合起来以引导注意力。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 17;11(1):6170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85605-8.
5
Predicting how color and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention.预测颜色和形状如何在人类视觉系统中组合以引导注意力。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 30;9(1):20258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56238-9.
6
Residual Information of Previous Decision Affects Evidence Accumulation in Current Decision.先前决策的残留信息会影响当前决策中的证据积累。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Feb 5;13:9. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00009. eCollection 2019.
7
You prime what you code: The fAIM model of priming of pop-out.你编码的内容是经过启动的:弹出式启动的fAIM模型。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 22;12(11):e0187556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187556. eCollection 2017.
8
The long and the short of priming in visual search.视觉搜索中的启动效应:长与短
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1558-73. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0860-2.
9
Color priming in pop-out search depends on the relative color of the target.突显目标颜色取决于目标的相对颜色。
Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 8;5:289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00289. eCollection 2014.
10
Testing a postselectional account of across-dimension switch costs.检验跨维度切换代价的后置选择解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Dec;17(6):853-61. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.6.853.