Dahan Rachel, Borkan Jeffry, Brown Judith-Bell, Reis Shmuel, Hermoni Doron, Harris Stewart
Department of Family Medicine, The B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, The Technion Institute of Technology and Clalit Health Services Haifa and W G, Israel.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):616-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00855.x.
Current low back pain (LBP) clinical guidelines have helped to summarize the scientific evidence and research, but have failed to provide tools and guide family physicians (FPs). The purpose of this study is to identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of LBP guidelines from family FPs' perspective.
A qualitative focus group study of FPs in the north of Israel. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit participants, all of them board-certified FPs. Four focus groups were created, and discussions were taped, transcribed and analysed for major themes.
Focus groups findings have expanded the understanding of the intellectual and mental challenges faced by Israeli FPs caring for LBP patients and highlighted the many obstacles to implementing LBP guidelines. Physicians' decision-making, pertaining to LBP, functions on three levels simultaneously: the physicians' agenda based on familiarity with the guidelines; their need to remain grounded in the context of the specific patient-doctor relationship; and the constraints and demands of the physician's workplace, medical system and environment.
Despite an overall positive attitude towards LBP guideline implementation, FPs found it hard to come to terms with the conflicting dimensions of LBP patient care. The patient-doctor interaction determined the outcome of the encounter, whether it complied with the guidelines and whether the encounter leads to a healing process or to a vicious circle of unnecessary utilization of services.
当前的腰痛(LBP)临床指南有助于总结科学证据和研究成果,但未能提供工具并指导家庭医生(FPs)。本研究的目的是从家庭医生的角度确定实施腰痛指南的障碍和促进因素。
对以色列北部的家庭医生进行了一项定性焦点小组研究。采用目的抽样法招募参与者,他们均为获得委员会认证的家庭医生。创建了四个焦点小组,并对讨论进行录音、转录和分析以确定主要主题。
焦点小组的研究结果扩展了对照顾腰痛患者的以色列家庭医生所面临的智力和心理挑战的理解,并突出了实施腰痛指南的诸多障碍。医生关于腰痛的决策同时在三个层面发挥作用:基于对指南熟悉程度的医生议程;他们需要在特定医患关系的背景下保持务实;以及医生工作场所、医疗系统和环境的限制与要求。
尽管对实施腰痛指南总体持积极态度,但家庭医生发现难以应对腰痛患者护理中相互冲突的方面。医患互动决定了诊疗结果,即是否符合指南,以及诊疗是否会导致康复过程或陷入不必要服务过度使用的恶性循环。