• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生报告在临床实践中使用基于证据的腰痛推荐的障碍:使用理论领域框架进行系统评价和定性研究的综合分析。

Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based recommendations for low back pain in clinical practice: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

机构信息

Primary Healthcare Research Unit (PHRU), Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, Room 417 | Janeway Hostel, Health Sciences Centre, 300 Prince Philip Parkway, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2019 May 7;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0884-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-019-0884-4
PMID:31064375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6505266/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adoption of low back pain guidelines is a well-documented problem. Information to guide the development of behaviour change interventions is needed. The review is the first to synthesise the evidence regarding physicians' barriers to providing evidence-based care for LBP using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Using the TDF allowed us to map specific physician-reported barriers to individual guideline recommendations. Therefore, the results can provide direction to future interventions to increase physician compliance with evidence-based care for LBP.

METHODS

We searched the literature for qualitative studies from inception to July 2018. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility and extracted data on study characteristics, reporting quality, and methodological rigour. Guided by a TDF coding manual, two reviewers independently coded the individual study themes using NVivo. After coding, we assessed confidence in the findings using the GRADE-CERQual approach.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (n = 318 physicians) from 9 countries reported barriers to adopting one of the 5 guideline-recommended behaviours regarding in-clinic diagnostic assessments (9 studies, n = 198), advice on activity (7 studies, n = 194), medication prescription (2 studies, n = 39), imaging referrals (11 studies, n = 270), and treatment/specialist referrals (8 studies, n = 193). Imaging behaviour is influenced by (1) social influence-from patients requesting an image or wanting a diagnosis (n = 252, 9 studies), (2) beliefs about consequence-physicians believe that providing a scan will reassure patients (n = 175, 6 studies), and (3) environmental context and resources-physicians report a lack of time to have a conversation with patients about diagnosis and why a scan is not needed (n = 179, 6 studies). Referrals to conservative care is influenced by environmental context and resources-long wait-times or a complete lack of access to adjunct services prevented physicians from referring to these services (n = 82, 5 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians face numerous barriers to providing evidence-based LBP care which we have mapped onto 7 TDF domains. Two to five TDF domains are involved in determining physician behaviour, confirming the complexity of this problem. This is important as interventions often target a single domain where multiple domains are involved. Interventions designed to address all the domains involved while considering context-specific factors may prove most successful in increasing guideline adoption.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2017, CRD42017070703.

摘要

背景

采用腰痛指南是一个有据可查的问题。需要信息来指导行为改变干预措施的制定。本综述是首次使用理论领域框架(TDF)综合关于医生为腰痛提供循证护理的障碍的证据。使用 TDF 使我们能够将医生报告的具体障碍映射到个别指南建议上。因此,这些结果可以为未来增加医生对腰痛循证护理的依从性的干预措施提供方向。

方法

我们从最初开始搜索文献,直到 2018 年 7 月,以获取定性研究。两位作者独立筛选标题、摘要和全文的资格,并提取有关研究特征、报告质量和方法严谨性的数据。在 TDF 编码手册的指导下,两位审稿人使用 NVivo 独立对个别研究主题进行编码。编码后,我们使用 GRADE-CERQual 方法评估研究结果的可信度。

结果

来自 9 个国家的 14 项研究(n=318 名医生)报告了与以下 5 项指南推荐行为之一有关的障碍:(9 项研究,n=198)在诊所进行诊断评估,(7 项研究,n=194)关于活动的建议,(2 项研究,n=39)药物处方,(11 项研究,n=270)影像学转诊,(8 项研究,n=193)治疗/专科转诊。影像学行为受到(1)来自患者的社会影响,他们要求进行影像检查或寻求诊断(n=252,9 项研究),(2)信念的影响,医生认为提供扫描将使患者安心(n=175,6 项研究),(3)环境背景和资源的影响,医生报告缺乏与患者就诊断和不需要扫描进行对话的时间(n=179,6 项研究)。转诊到保守治疗受到环境背景和资源的影响-较长的等待时间或完全缺乏辅助服务的机会,使医生无法转诊到这些服务(n=82,5 项研究)。

结论

医生在提供腰痛循证护理方面面临着许多障碍,我们已经将这些障碍映射到了 7 个 TDF 领域。有 2 到 5 个 TDF 领域参与决定医生的行为,这证实了这个问题的复杂性。这很重要,因为干预措施通常针对单个领域,而多个领域都涉及其中。设计干预措施以解决所有涉及的领域,并考虑具体的背景因素,可能会在增加指南的采用方面最成功。

登记

PROSPERO 2017,CRD42017070703。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0c/6505266/9c8f649aa361/13012_2019_884_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0c/6505266/bdcb2aa4244b/13012_2019_884_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0c/6505266/78f8f77dca94/13012_2019_884_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0c/6505266/9c8f649aa361/13012_2019_884_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0c/6505266/bdcb2aa4244b/13012_2019_884_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0c/6505266/78f8f77dca94/13012_2019_884_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0c/6505266/9c8f649aa361/13012_2019_884_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based recommendations for low back pain in clinical practice: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the Theoretical Domains Framework.医生报告在临床实践中使用基于证据的腰痛推荐的障碍:使用理论领域框架进行系统评价和定性研究的综合分析。
Implement Sci. 2019 May 7;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0884-4.
2
Using theory to improve low back pain care in Australian Aboriginal primary care: a mixed method single cohort pilot study.运用理论改善澳大利亚原住民初级保健中的腰痛护理:一项混合方法单队列试点研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 12;17:44. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0441-z.
3
What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging?为了提高对基于证据的腰痛影像学检查的依从性,采用了哪些行为改变技术?
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 2;16(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01136-w.
4
General practitioner views on the determinants of test ordering: a theory-based qualitative approach to the development of an intervention to improve immunoglobulin requests in primary care.全科医生对检查开单决定因素的看法:一种基于理论的定性方法,用于开发一项改善基层医疗中免疫球蛋白申请的干预措施。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 19;11(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0465-8.
5
Physiotherapist- and patient-reported barriers to guideline implementation of active physiotherapeutic management of low back pain: A theory-informed qualitative study.物理治疗师和患者报告的主动物理治疗管理腰痛指南实施障碍:一项基于理论的定性研究。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Oct;73:103129. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103129. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
6
Barriers to following imaging guidelines for the treatment and management of patients with low-back pain in primary care: a qualitative assessment guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework.在初级保健中治疗和管理腰痛患者时遵循影像学指南的障碍:基于理论领域框架的定性评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 3;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01751-6.
7
Barriers to primary care clinician adherence to clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain: protocol of a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.基层医疗临床医生遵循腰痛管理临床指南的障碍:定性研究的系统评价与元综合方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 21;5(4):e007265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007265.
8
Barriers to Primary Care Clinician Adherence to Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies.基层医疗临床医生遵循腰痛管理临床指南的障碍:定性研究的系统评价与整合分析
Clin J Pain. 2016 Sep;32(9):800-16. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000324.
9
Exploring factors influencing chiropractors' adherence to radiographic guidelines for low back pain using the Theoretical Domains Framework.运用理论领域框架探索影响脊医遵循下腰痛放射影像学指南的因素。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 May 9;30(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00433-5.
10
Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain.急性下腰痛指南实施的教育与反馈随机对照试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Oct;18(10):773-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10205.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Choices and Healthcare Services Utilization Amongst Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Patients: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.腰骶神经根病患者的治疗选择与医疗服务利用情况:一项随机对照试验的结果
OBM Integr Compliment Med. 2025;10(3). doi: 10.21926/obm.icm.2503035. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
2
Facilitators and barriers to deferring imaging for acute low back pain: a qualitative study.急性下腰痛延迟影像学检查的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 2;26(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02902-1.
3
An exploration of patients' perceptions and coping strategies for LBP.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators for provision of oral health care in dependent older people: a systematic review.照顾依赖老年人的口腔健康的障碍和促进因素:系统综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):979-993. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02812-4. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
2
Impact of an Advanced Imaging Utilization Review Program on Downstream Health Care Utilization and Costs for Low Back Pain.高级影像学利用审查计划对腰痛的下游医疗保健利用和成本的影响。
Med Care. 2018 Jun;56(6):520-528. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000917.
3
What Do Patients with Chronic Spinal Pain Expect from Their Physiotherapist?
对患者对下背痛的认知及应对策略的探索。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 9;20(6):e0324859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324859. eCollection 2025.
4
Pain Medication in Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下腰痛的止痛药物
Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;15(5):690. doi: 10.3390/life15050690.
5
'I Have Never Been in That Kind of All-Consuming Pain … I Did Not Know What Else to Do': The Journey to Hospital Admission With Low Back Pain From the Perspectives of Patients.“我从未经历过那种痛彻心扉的疼痛……我不知道还能做些什么”:从患者视角看因腰痛入院的历程
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70269. doi: 10.1111/hex.70269.
6
Dissemination Strategies for Clinical Practice Guidelines Focused on Imaging for Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review.针对腰痛影像学检查的临床实践指南传播策略:一项范围综述
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Jun;23(2):e70086. doi: 10.1002/msc.70086.
7
Implementation of the American- College of Physicians Guideline for Low Back Pain (IMPACt-LBP): protocol for a healthcare systems embedded multisite pragmatic cluster-randomised trial.美国医师学会腰痛指南的实施(IMPACt-LBP):一项嵌入医疗系统的多地点实用整群随机试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 26;15(3):e097133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097133.
8
Understanding patients' perceptions of uncomplicated low back pain: a theory-informed qualitative study using the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model.了解患者对单纯性下腰痛的认知:一项基于常识自我调节模型的理论定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 25;26(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02786-1.
9
"Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam," and "reasonably confident without imaging": a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back pain.“从病史和体格检查中收获颇丰”以及“无需影像学检查也有相当把握”:对基层医疗临床医生管理腰痛患者的定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 5;26(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02726-z.
10
Factors contributing to non-compliance with active physiotherapy guidelines among chronic low back pain patients in India.印度慢性下背痛患者不遵守积极物理治疗指南的相关因素。
Arch Physiother. 2024 Dec 29;14:155-169. doi: 10.33393/aop.2024.3217. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
慢性脊柱疼痛患者对物理治疗师有何期望?
Physiother Can. 2018;70(1):36-41. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-58.
4
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估——第 2 部分:如何对信心进行全面的 CERQual 评估并创建定性研究结果总结表。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0689-2.
5
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 4: how to assess coherence.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估-第 4 部分:如何评估一致性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8.
6
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估-第 6 篇:如何评估数据的相关性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0693-6.
7
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估:简介系列。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3.
8
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估-第 3 部分:如何评估方法学局限性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0690-9.
9
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估 - 第 5 部分:如何评估数据充分性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0692-7.
10
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 7: understanding the potential impacts of dissemination bias.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估 - 第 7 篇:了解传播偏倚的潜在影响。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0694-5.