Turner Lauren M, Stone Wendy L
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3367, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;48(8):793-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01744.x.
Few studies have examined the variability in outcomes of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) at age 2. Research is needed to understand the children whose symptoms - or diagnoses - change over time. The objectives of this study were to examine the behavioral and diagnostic outcomes of a carefully defined sample of 2-year-old children with ASD, and to identify child and environmental factors that contribute to variability in outcomes at age 4.
Forty-eight children diagnosed with autism or pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDDNOS) at age 2 were followed to age 4. Diagnostic measures included the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - Generic (ADOS-G) and clinical diagnosis at ages 2 and 4, and the ADI-R at age 4.
Diagnostic stability for an ASD diagnosis (autism or PDDNOS) was 63%, and for an autism diagnosis was 68%. Children who failed to meet diagnostic criteria for ASD at follow-up were more likely to: 1) be 30 months or younger at initial evaluation; 2) have milder symptoms of autism, particularly in the social domain; and 3) have higher cognitive scores at age 2. No differences between children with stable and unstable diagnoses were found for amount of intervention services received. Among the children with unstable diagnoses, all but one continued to have developmental disorders, most commonly in the area of language.
The stability of ASD was lower in the present study than has been reported previously, a finding largely attributable to children who were diagnosed at 30 months or younger. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
很少有研究探讨2岁时被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童其预后的变异性。需要开展研究来了解那些症状或诊断随时间变化的儿童。本研究的目的是考察一组经过精心界定的2岁ASD儿童样本的行为和诊断预后,并确定导致4岁时预后变异性的儿童及环境因素。
对48名2岁时被诊断为自闭症或未特定的广泛性发育障碍(PDDNOS)的儿童进行随访至4岁。诊断措施包括《自闭症诊断观察量表通用版》(ADOS-G)以及2岁和4岁时的临床诊断,4岁时采用《自闭症诊断访谈修订版》(ADI-R)。
ASD诊断(自闭症或PDDNOS)的诊断稳定性为63%,自闭症诊断的稳定性为68%。随访时未达到ASD诊断标准的儿童更有可能:1)初次评估时为30个月或更小;2)自闭症症状较轻,尤其是在社交领域;3)2岁时认知得分较高。在接受的干预服务量方面,诊断稳定和不稳定的儿童之间未发现差异。在诊断不稳定的儿童中,除一人外,其他所有人都持续存在发育障碍,最常见的是在语言领域。
本研究中ASD的稳定性低于先前报道,这一发现很大程度上归因于30个月或更小年龄时被诊断的儿童。文中讨论了对临床实践的启示。