Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; CT Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Storrs, CT, USA.
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;34:103043. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103043. Epub 2022 May 10.
This study probed for structural language impairment using behavioral and functional neuroimaging methods in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and those diagnosed with ASD in childhood who no longer meet criteria for ASD, referred to as Loss of Autism Diagnosis (LAD). Participants were drawn from Fein et al. (2013): ASD (n = 35), LAD (n = 31), and Neurotypical (NT; n = 34). Criteria for structural language impairment were: Scores ≤ 82 on Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-4 (CELF) Core Language, an omnibus measure of language; and scores ≤ 7 on CELF Recalling Sentences, a clinical marker of structural language impairment. Task-based fMRI examined lateralization of significantly activated language-related brain regions in groups with structural language impairment (LI) versus normal-range language (LN), collapsed across ASD, LAD, and NT status. Results showed no ASD versus LAD group differences in the proportion of participants with structural language impairment according to either metric (Recalling Sentences or Core Language). Functional MRI results indicated greater left hemisphere lateralization within significantly activated regions in the LI group. Structural language abilities were not meaningfully associated with either social abilities or lifetime ADHD symptoms in LI subgroups, further suggesting the presence of structural language impairment. Findings indicate the presence of persistent structural language difficulty even in the absence of ASD symptoms in some individuals within the LAD group and unique patterns of language-related neural specialization for language function in LI relative to LN.
本研究使用行为和功能神经影像学方法,在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者和那些在儿童时期被诊断为 ASD 但不再符合 ASD 标准的患者(称为 ASD 诊断丧失,LAD)中,探究了结构性语言损伤。参与者来自 Fein 等人(2013 年):ASD(n=35)、LAD(n=31)和神经典型(NT;n=34)。结构性语言损伤的标准为:临床评估语言基础-4(CELF)核心语言的得分≤82,这是语言的综合衡量标准;以及 CELF 回忆句子的得分≤7,这是结构性语言损伤的临床标志。基于任务的 fMRI 检查了结构性语言损伤(LI)组与正常语言(LN)组中,与语言相关的显著激活脑区的侧化情况,这两组均合并了 ASD、LAD 和 NT 状态。结果表明,根据这两种标准(回忆句子或核心语言),ASD 与 LAD 组在结构性语言损伤的参与者比例上没有差异。功能性 MRI 结果表明,在 LI 组中,在显著激活的区域内,左半球的侧化程度更大。在 LI 亚组中,结构性语言能力与社会能力或终生 ADHD 症状均无明显关联,进一步表明存在结构性语言损伤。这些发现表明,即使在 LAD 组的某些个体中没有 ASD 症状,也存在持续的结构性语言困难,并且在 LI 与 LN 相比,语言相关的神经特化存在独特的模式。