University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
UK National Screening Committee, London, UK.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241263223. doi: 10.1177/21501319241263223.
Early detection of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has the potential to significantly reduce the impact of the condition, however previous reviews have found little evidence to support screening programs for ASD in young children.
We conducted a review with the aim of updating evidence on 3 aspects: (a) diagnostic stability of ASD in young children; (b) accuracy of ASD screening tools in young children; and (c) the benefits of early interventions in screen-detected young children with ASD.
A total of 33 studies were included in our review. Five studies looking at diagnostic stability reported estimates ranging from 71.9% to 100%, however the majority only included a follow-up of 24 months and all studies raised concerns regarding the risk of bias due particularly to lack of blinding, sample size, and patient flow. A total of 25 studies, reported in 26 articles, were identified that reported accuracy data on 11 screening tools. Most of the reports were concerned with versions of M-CHAT, reporting sensitivity estimates from 0.67 to 1.0; however, many of these were deemed to be of high risk of bias due to lack of blinding and follow-up. Four studies reported on early interventions in screen-detected children; however, the majority did not find significant improvements on the relevant outcomes.
Overall, the evidence on screening for ASD in young children captured by this review is not conclusive regarding the 3 aspects of screening in this population. Future studies should attempt to ensure blinded diagnostic assessments, include longer follow-up periods and limit attrition.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的早期发现有可能显著降低其影响,但之前的综述发现几乎没有证据支持对幼儿进行 ASD 筛查计划。
我们进行了一项综述,旨在更新关于以下三个方面的证据:(a)幼儿 ASD 的诊断稳定性;(b)幼儿 ASD 筛查工具的准确性;(c)早期干预对经筛查发现的 ASD 幼儿的益处。
我们的综述共纳入 33 项研究。五项研究报告了 ASD 的诊断稳定性,估计范围从 71.9%到 100%,但大多数仅进行了 24 个月的随访,所有研究都对偏倚风险表示担忧,主要是由于缺乏盲法、样本量和患者流动。共确定了 25 项研究,在 26 篇文章中报告了 11 种筛查工具的准确性数据。其中大多数报告涉及 M-CHAT 的版本,报告的敏感度估计值从 0.67 到 1.0;然而,由于缺乏盲法和随访,许多研究被认为存在较高的偏倚风险。四项研究报告了对经筛查发现的儿童进行早期干预的情况;然而,大多数研究并未发现相关结局有显著改善。
总的来说,本次综述中针对幼儿 ASD 筛查的证据,在这一人群的三个筛查方面都没有定论。未来的研究应努力确保盲法诊断评估、包括更长的随访期和限制流失。