Suppr超能文献

西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后新生内膜覆盖不全的系列血管内镜证据:与裸金属支架的比较

Serial angioscopic evidence of incomplete neointimal coverage after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: comparison with bare-metal stents.

作者信息

Awata Masaki, Kotani Jun-ichi, Uematsu Masaaki, Morozumi Takakazu, Watanabe Tetsuya, Onishi Toshinari, Iida Osamu, Sera Fusako, Nanto Shinsuke, Hori Masatsugu, Nagata Seiki

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

Circulation. 2007 Aug 21;116(8):910-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.609057. Epub 2007 Aug 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The time course of neointimal formation after stent implantation has not been studied extensively by angioscopy in the drug-eluting stent era.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Serial angioscopic findings at first follow-up (3.6+/-1.1 months), second follow-up (10.5+/-1.6 months), and third follow-up (21.2+/-2.2 months) after stent implantation were compared between sirolimus-eluting stents (SES, n=17) and bare-metal stents (BMS, n=11). Neointimal coverage, thrombus, and presence of yellow plaques underneath the stents were assessed. Neointimal coverage was graded as follows: grade 0, stent struts were fully visible; grade 1, struts bulged into the lumen, although they were covered; grade 2, struts were embedded by the neointima but were seen translucently; or grade 3, struts were fully embedded and invisible. Neointimal coverage was remarkably different between SES and BMS at each follow-up point. Neointimal coverage grade was 1.1+/-0.5 in SES versus 2.9+/-0.3 in BMS at the first follow-up (P<0.0001), 1.1+/-0.5 in SES versus 3.0+/-0.0 in BMS (P<0.0001) at the second follow-up, and 1.3+/-0.5 in SES versus 3.0+/-0.0 in BMS at the third follow-up (P=0.0009). No significant serial changes in coverage grade were noted in the BMS group, whereas coverage grade slightly but significantly increased at the third follow-up in the SES group (P<0.05). Thrombi were detected in 4 SES: a red thrombus was seen from the first to the third follow-up in 2; another was detected only at the third follow-up; and the fourth was seen at the first follow-up but disappeared at the second follow-up, associated with a new white thrombus despite dual antiplatelet therapy. Yellow plaques had disappeared by the time of the second follow-up in BMS. In contrast, yellow plaques were exposed in 71% of SES at the first follow-up and remained exposed until the third follow-up. Neointimal coverage grades correlated with thrombi (P=0.002) and with yellow plaques (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial angioscopic findings up to 2 years after SES implantation were markedly different from those after BMS. Neointimal coverage was completed by 3 to 6 months in BMS. In contrast, SES demonstrated the presence of thrombi and yellow plaques even as much as 2 years after implantation.

摘要

背景

在药物洗脱支架时代,血管内镜尚未广泛研究支架植入后新生内膜形成的时间进程。

方法与结果

比较了西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES,n = 17)和裸金属支架(BMS,n = 11)植入后首次随访(3.6±1.1个月)、第二次随访(10.5±1.6个月)和第三次随访(21.2±2.2个月)时的系列血管内镜检查结果。评估了新生内膜覆盖情况、血栓以及支架下方黄色斑块的存在情况。新生内膜覆盖情况分级如下:0级,支架小梁完全可见;1级,小梁向管腔内突出,尽管被覆盖;2级,小梁被新生内膜包埋但仍可半透明地看到;3级,小梁完全被包埋且不可见。在每个随访点,SES和BMS的新生内膜覆盖情况有显著差异。首次随访时,SES的新生内膜覆盖分级为1.1±0.5,而BMS为2.9±0.3(P<0.0001);第二次随访时,SES为1.1±0.5,BMS为3.0±0.0(P<0.0001);第三次随访时,SES为1.3±0.5,BMS为3.0±0.0(P = 0.0009)。BMS组的覆盖分级无显著的系列变化,而SES组在第三次随访时覆盖分级略有但显著增加(P<0.05)。在4个SES中检测到血栓:2个从首次随访至第三次随访可见红色血栓;另一个仅在第三次随访时检测到;第四个在首次随访时可见但在第二次随访时消失,尽管进行了双联抗血小板治疗,但出现了新白色血栓。BMS中黄色斑块在第二次随访时已消失。相比之下,SES在首次随访时有71%的黄色斑块暴露,直至第三次随访时仍保持暴露。新生内膜覆盖分级与血栓(P = 0.002)和黄色斑块(P<0.0001)相关。

结论

SES植入后长达2年的系列血管内镜检查结果与BMS明显不同。BMS在3至6个月时完成新生内膜覆盖。相比之下,SES即使在植入后2年仍有血栓和黄色斑块存在。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验