Zhao Heng, Steinberg Gary K, Sapolsky Robert M
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5327, USA.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007 Dec;27(12):1879-94. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600540. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
Mild or moderate hypothermia is generally thought to block all changes in signaling events that are detrimental to ischemic brain, including ATP depletion, glutamate release, Ca(2+) mobilization, anoxic depolarization, free radical generation, inflammation, blood-brain barrier permeability, necrotic, and apoptotic pathways. However, the effects and mechanisms of hypothermia are, in fact, variable. We emphasize that, even in the laboratory, hypothermic protection is limited. In certain models of permanent focal ischemia, hypothermia may not protect at all. In cases where hypothermia reduces infarct, some studies have overemphasized its ability to maintain cerebral blood flow and ATP levels, and to prevent anoxic depolarization, glutamate release during ischemia. Instead, hypothermia may protect against ischemia by regulating cascades that occur after reperfusion, including blood-brain barrier permeability and the changes in gene and protein expressions associated with necrotic and apoptotic pathways. Hypothermia not only blocks multiple damaging cascades after stroke, but also selectively upregulates some protective genes. However, most of these mechanisms are addressed in models with intraischemic hypothermia; much less information is available in models with postischemic hypothermia. Moreover, although it has been confirmed that mild hypothermia is clinically feasible for acute focal stroke treatment, no definite beneficial effect has been reported yet. This lack of clinical protection may result from suboptimal criteria for patient entrance into clinical trials. To facilitate clinical translation, future efforts in the laboratory should focus more on the protective mechanisms of postischemic hypothermia, as well as on the effects of sex, age and rewarming during reperfusion on hypothermic protection.
一般认为,轻度或中度低温可阻断所有对缺血性脑有害的信号事件变化,包括ATP耗竭、谷氨酸释放、Ca(2+)动员、缺氧去极化、自由基生成、炎症、血脑屏障通透性、坏死和凋亡途径。然而,事实上低温的作用和机制是可变的。我们强调,即使在实验室中,低温保护也是有限的。在某些永久性局灶性缺血模型中,低温可能根本没有保护作用。在低温可减少梗死灶的情况下,一些研究过度强调了其维持脑血流量和ATP水平以及防止缺血期间缺氧去极化、谷氨酸释放的能力。相反,低温可能通过调节再灌注后发生的级联反应来预防缺血,包括血脑屏障通透性以及与坏死和凋亡途径相关的基因和蛋白质表达变化。低温不仅可阻断中风后的多种损伤级联反应,还可选择性地上调一些保护基因。然而,这些机制大多在缺血期低温模型中得到研究;关于缺血后低温模型的信息则少得多。此外,尽管已证实轻度低温在急性局灶性中风治疗中在临床上是可行的,但尚未报道有明确的有益效果。这种缺乏临床保护作用的情况可能是由于患者进入临床试验的标准不够理想所致。为促进临床转化,未来实验室的工作应更多地关注缺血后低温的保护机制,以及性别、年龄和再灌注期间复温对低温保护的影响。