Miura Marlo, Daynard Richard A, Samet Jonathan M
Public Health Advocacy Institute, Boston, USA.
Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48 Suppl 1:S121-36. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342006000700015.
There is now 50-years of experience in the United States litigating against the tobacco industry. As the base of evidence regarding health effects has evolved and new legal strategies have emerged, successive waves of litigation have occurred. The many failures by the first and second waves were followed by some notable successes in the third. Litigation by flight attendants and the states led to substantial settlements and some beneficial consequences for tobacco control. One of the most significant consequences of state litigation was access to the industry's documents, gained through the Minnesota settlement. These documents further empowered the tobacco control movement and strengthened the basis for legal action. The continuing litigation in the United States remains a threat to the industry, in spite of the mixed outcomes of recent cases.
在美国,针对烟草行业的诉讼已有50年历史。随着有关健康影响的证据基础不断演变,新的法律策略不断涌现,诉讼浪潮接连不断。第一波和第二波诉讼大多失败,随后第三波取得了一些显著成功。空乘人员和各州发起的诉讼达成了巨额和解,并给烟草控制带来了一些有益影响。州诉讼最重大的后果之一是通过明尼苏达和解协议获取了该行业的文件。这些文件进一步推动了烟草控制运动,并加强了法律行动的基础。尽管近期案件的结果喜忧参半,但美国持续不断的诉讼仍然对该行业构成威胁。