Gibson Sigrid
Sig-Nurture Ltd, 11 Woodway, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 2TF, UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2007 Oct;10(10):980-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007787773. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
To summarise the discussions of a seminar on peer-led approaches to dietary change held at the Food Standards Agency (FSA) on 19 July 2006.
Following presentations on three FSA-commissioned research projects involving peer-led dietary interventions, discussions in small workshop groups identified learning points for researchers, policy-makers and practitioners and considered how the findings of such studies can be effectively communicated to each of these groups. The target groups in the three separate projects were: older people living in sheltered accommodation; mothers and babies during the weaning period; and people with diabetes.
The projects discussed here were quite different from one another, involving three separate populations, having different aims and approaches and different styles of peer leading. Their effectiveness in achieving quantitative dietary change was disappointing. However, results for some of the qualitative outcomes (social, psychological, behavioural) were more positive. Process evaluation, whether built in or post hoc, provided useful learning to inform future projects and potentially improve their effectiveness and usefulness for researchers, policy-makers and health promotion practitioners.
The projects discussed here showed that peer-led interventions can achieve positive changes in outcomes such as knowledge, confidence and attitudes, as well as small improvements in diet. They also demonstrated that there is a need for a more sophisticated analysis of peer-led interventions that recognises the diversity of approaches and their suitability in different situations.
总结2006年7月19日在食品标准局(FSA)举行的关于同伴主导的饮食改变方法研讨会的讨论内容。
在介绍了三个由FSA委托开展的涉及同伴主导饮食干预的研究项目后,小型工作坊小组进行了讨论,确定了研究人员、政策制定者和从业者的经验教训,并探讨了如何将此类研究结果有效地传达给这些群体。这三个独立项目的目标群体分别是:居住在庇护性住房中的老年人;断奶期的母亲和婴儿;以及糖尿病患者。
这里讨论的项目彼此差异很大,涉及三个不同的人群,有不同的目标、方法和同伴主导风格。它们在实现饮食定量改变方面的效果令人失望。然而,一些定性结果(社会、心理、行为方面)更为积极。过程评估,无论是内置的还是事后的,都提供了有益的经验教训,为未来项目提供参考,并有可能提高其对研究人员、政策制定者和健康促进从业者的有效性和实用性。
这里讨论的项目表明,同伴主导的干预措施可以在知识、信心和态度等方面取得积极变化,以及在饮食方面有小幅改善。它们还表明,需要对同伴主导的干预措施进行更深入的分析,认识到方法的多样性及其在不同情况下的适用性。