Bates Sarah J, Trostle James, Cevallos William T, Hubbard Alan, Eisenberg Joseph N S
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Nov 1;166(9):1088-95. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm184. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
Social networks and geographic structures of communities are important predictors of infectious disease transmission. To examine their joint effects on diarrheal disease and how these effects might develop, the authors analyzed social network and geographic data from northern coastal Ecuador and examined associations with diarrhea prevalence. Between July 2003 and May 2005, 113 cases of diarrhea were identified in nine communities. Concurrently, sociometric surveys were conducted, and households were mapped with geographic information systems. Spatial distribution metrics of households within communities and of communities with respect to roads were developed that predict social network degree in casual contact ("contact") and food-sharing ("food") networks. The mean degree is 25-40% lower in communities with versus without road access and 66-94% lower in communities with lowest versus highest housing density. Associations with diarrheal disease were found for housing density (comparing dense with dispersed communities: risk ratio = 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1, 10.0) and social connectedness (comparing lowest with highest degree communities: risk ratio = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 10.1 in the contact network and risk ratio = 4.9, 95% CI: 1.1, 21.9 in the food network). Some of these differences may be related to more new residents, lower housing density, and less social connectedness in road communities.
社区的社交网络和地理结构是传染病传播的重要预测因素。为了研究它们对腹泻疾病的联合影响以及这些影响可能如何发展,作者分析了厄瓜多尔北部沿海地区的社交网络和地理数据,并研究了与腹泻患病率的关联。在2003年7月至2005年5月期间,在9个社区中确定了113例腹泻病例。同时,进行了社会测量调查,并使用地理信息系统绘制了家庭分布图。开发了社区内家庭以及社区相对于道路的空间分布指标,这些指标可预测偶然接触(“接触”)网络和食物共享(“食物”)网络中的社交网络程度。有道路通达的社区与无道路通达的社区相比,平均度数低25 - 40%,住房密度最低的社区与最高的社区相比,平均度数低66 - 94%。发现住房密度(密集社区与分散社区比较:风险比 = 3.3,95%置信区间(CI):1.1,10.0)和社会连通性(度数最低的社区与最高的社区比较:在接触网络中风险比 = 3.4,95%CI:1.1,10.1;在食物网络中风险比 = 4.9,95%CI:1.1,21.9)与腹泻疾病有关。其中一些差异可能与道路社区中有更多新居民、较低的住房密度和较少的社会连通性有关。