Wearley L L
Schering-Plough Corp., Kenilworth, NJ 07033.
Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1991;8(4):331-94.
Much progress has been made in the last 5 years toward delivery of protein and peptide drugs by noninvasive routes. The obstacles of instability, poor absorption, rapid metabolism, and nonlinear pharmacokinetics are great challenges for which some solutions are now emerging. Structural modifications of the protein by chemical or recombinant means have improved stability and minimized enzymatic cleavage in some cases. Protection of the protein or peptide drug via liposomes or polymers also offers a means for increasing stability and prolonging half-life. Novel permeation enhancers, which show minimal irritation to mucosal membranes, have become available and show promise for increasing absorption of proteins delivered by a number of noninvasive routes. There are examples in which several of these methods have been used concomitantly to achieve maximum effect; for instance, a bioadhesive microsphere formulation containing a novel permeation enhancer was used to maximize nasal delivery of insulin. Therefore, general methods exist whereby delivery by any noninvasive route may be improved. In some cases, choice of the best route of delivery for a particular drug makes the difference between success and failure. A comparison of the enzyme activity at the various sites of delivery is helpful and, fortuitously, the enkephalins, model peptides whose rate of cleavage and type of degradation products offer information about the type and activity of enzymes present, have been studied extensively. This work is reviewed for each delivery site as are the effects of coadministration of enzyme inhibitors. Permeation enhancers and examples for their use at each site of delivery are presented. The use of polymers for bioadhesion and for protection from metabolism at various sites is reviewed. Since systemic delivery of proteins via the pulmonary route is now receiving more attention, special emphasis is given to that work. Generally, the focus is on work published or presented since 1988, since publications prior to that date have already been thoroughly reviewed. The studies presented indicate that the problems of delivering protein and peptide drugs by noninvasive means can be minimized; although delivery by these routes still may not be bioequivalent to invasive methods, the convenience to the patient will, in some cases, outweigh the demand for complete bioequivalence.
在过去5年中,通过非侵入性途径递送蛋白质和肽类药物已取得了很大进展。稳定性差、吸收不良、代谢迅速和非线性药代动力学等障碍是巨大的挑战,目前正在出现一些解决方案。在某些情况下,通过化学或重组手段对蛋白质进行结构修饰可提高稳定性并使酶切作用最小化。通过脂质体或聚合物对蛋白质或肽类药物进行保护,也为提高稳定性和延长半衰期提供了一种手段。对粘膜刺激性极小的新型渗透促进剂已经出现,并有望增加多种非侵入性途径递送的蛋白质的吸收。有一些例子表明,同时使用这些方法中的几种可达到最大效果;例如,含有新型渗透促进剂的生物粘附微球制剂被用于最大限度地提高胰岛素的鼻腔递送量。因此,存在一些通用方法可改善通过任何非侵入性途径的递送。在某些情况下,为特定药物选择最佳递送途径决定着成败。比较不同递送部位的酶活性是有帮助的,幸运的是,脑啡肽这种模型肽的裂解速率和降解产物类型可提供有关存在的酶的类型和活性的信息,已经得到了广泛研究。本文将对每个递送部位的这项工作以及酶抑制剂共同给药的效果进行综述。介绍了渗透促进剂及其在每个递送部位的使用实例。综述了聚合物在不同部位用于生物粘附和防止代谢的情况。由于通过肺部途径全身递送蛋白质目前受到越来越多的关注,因此将特别强调这项工作。一般来说,重点是1988年以来发表或展示的研究,因为在此日期之前的出版物已经得到了全面综述所呈现的研究表明,通过非侵入性手段递送蛋白质和肽类药物的问题可以最小化;尽管通过这些途径的递送可能仍与侵入性方法不具有生物等效性,但在某些情况下,对患者的便利性将超过对完全生物等效性的要求。