Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂:成本与时间的比较研究

Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time.

作者信息

Heemskerk Jeroen, de Hoog Dominique E N M, van Gemert Wim G, Baeten Cor G M I, Greve Jan Willem M, Bouvy Nicole D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Nov;50(11):1825-30. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9017-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic rectopexy has become one of the most advocated treatments for full-thickness rectal prolapse, offering good functional results compared with open surgery and resulting in less postoperative pain and faster convalescence. However, laparoscopic rectopexy can be technically demanding. Once having mastered dexterity, with robotic assistance, laparoscopic rectopexy can be performed faster. Moreover, it shortens the learning curve in simple laparoscopic tasks. This may lead to faster and safer laparoscopic surgery. Robot-assisted rectopexy has been proven safe and feasible; however, until now, no study has been performed comparing costs and time consumption in conventional laparoscopic rectopexy vs. robot-assisted rectopexy.

METHODS

Our first 14 cases of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy were reviewed and compared with 19 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic rectopexy in the same period.

RESULTS

Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy did not show more complications. However, the average operating time was 39 minutes longer, and costs were euro 557.29 (or: dollars 745.09) higher.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy is a safe and feasible procedure but results in increased time and higher costs than conventional laparoscopy.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜直肠固定术已成为全层直肠脱垂最常用的治疗方法之一,与开放手术相比,其功能效果良好,术后疼痛较轻,恢复较快。然而,腹腔镜直肠固定术在技术上要求较高。一旦掌握了操作技巧,在机器人辅助下,腹腔镜直肠固定术可以更快地完成。此外,它缩短了简单腹腔镜手术的学习曲线。这可能会使腹腔镜手术更快、更安全。机器人辅助直肠固定术已被证明是安全可行的;然而,到目前为止,尚未有研究比较传统腹腔镜直肠固定术与机器人辅助直肠固定术的成本和时间消耗。

方法

回顾了我们最初的14例机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠固定术病例,并与同期接受传统腹腔镜直肠固定术的19例患者进行了比较。

结果

机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠固定术并未显示出更多的并发症。然而,平均手术时间延长了39分钟,成本高出557.29欧元(或:745.09美元)。

结论

机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠固定术是一种安全可行的手术,但与传统腹腔镜手术相比,手术时间增加,成本更高。

相似文献

2
Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jul;56(7):909-14. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318289366e.
3
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Feb;17(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sle.0000213756.76761.b7.
4
Day case robotic ventral rectopexy compared with day case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective study.
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Oct;20(10):695-700. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1518-3. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
6
A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Oct;48(10):1930-40. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0077-x.
7
Increased cost burden associated with robot-assisted rectopexy: do patient outcomes justify increased expenditure?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2119-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09728-3. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
10
Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S153-S159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.359. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Rectal prolapse in adult patients with anorectal malformations: considerations for adult colorectal surgeons.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 15;41(1):171. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06077-9.
2
Scoping review of indications for robotic ventral mesh rectopexy: addressing variability in patient selection.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Apr 25;40(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04893-y.
4
The Learning Curve in Urogynecology and Functional Urology: A Systematic Review.
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-06016-7.
5
Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Treat Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Literature.
Cureus. 2023 May 13;15(5):e38956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38956. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Technical modifications for cost optimization in robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy: an initial experience.
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):551-557. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02756-8. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
7
A comparative study of the pathological outcomes of robot-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer.
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Apr;40(2):154-160. doi: 10.3393/ac.2022.00332.0047. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
8
Increased cost burden associated with robot-assisted rectopexy: do patient outcomes justify increased expenditure?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2119-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09728-3. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
9
Update on Robotic Rectal Prolapse Treatment.
J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 23;11(8):706. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080706.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Feb;17(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sle.0000213756.76761.b7.
3
Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems.
Surg Endosc. 2006 May;20(5):730-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0456-3. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
4
Management of recurrent rectal prolapse: surgical approach influences outcome.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Apr;49(4):440-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0315-2.
5
Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study.
Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):35-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-3012-2. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
6
Closed rectopexy with transanal resection for complete rectal prolapse in adults.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;9(7):980-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.04.007.
7
A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Oct;48(10):1930-40. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0077-x.
8
Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1200-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2257-5. Epub 2005 May 12.
9
Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Surg Endosc. 2004 Dec;18(12):1742-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9046-z. Epub 2004 Oct 26.
10
Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten years' experience.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):982-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0886-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验