Vanderburgh Paul M
Department of Health and Sport Science, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-1210, USA.
Mil Med. 2007 Jul;172(7):738-42. doi: 10.7205/milmed.172.7.738.
Recent research findings combined with the theoretical laws of biological similarity make the compelling case that all physical fitness test items for the Army, Air Force, and Navy impose a 15 to 20% physiological bias against heavier, not fatter, men and women. Using the published findings that actual scores of muscle and aerobic endurance scale by body mass raised to the 1/3 power, correction factor tables were developed. This correction factor can be multiplied by one's actual score (e.g., push-ups, sit-ups, abdominal crunches, or curl-up repetitions or distance run time) to yield adjusted scores that are free of body mass bias. These adjusted scores eliminate this bias, become better overall indicators of physical fitness relevant to military tasks, are easily applied to the scoring tables used in the present physical fitness tests, and do not reward body fatness. Use of these correction factors should be explored by all military services to contribute to more relevant fitness tests.
最近的研究结果与生物相似性的理论定律相结合,有力地证明了陆军、空军和海军的所有体能测试项目对体重较重而非体型较胖的男性和女性存在15%至20%的生理偏见。利用已发表的研究结果,即肌肉和有氧耐力量表的实际得分与体重的1/3次方成正比,制定了校正因子表。这个校正因子可以乘以个人的实际得分(例如,俯卧撑、仰卧起坐、仰卧起腹或卷腹重复次数或跑步时间),以得出消除了体重偏见的调整后得分。这些调整后得分消除了这种偏见,成为与军事任务相关的体能更全面的指标,易于应用于当前体能测试所使用的评分表,并且不奖励体脂。所有军种都应探索使用这些校正因子,以促进更具相关性的体能测试。