Lazarchik David A, Hammond Barry D, Sikes Christy L, Looney Stephen W, Rueggeberg Frederick A
Department of General Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-1260, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Aug;98(2):129-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60046-8.
Use of a bulk-fill/transtooth composite resin insertion/irradiation technique may not provide as well polymerized a restoration as when using a conventional incremental placement/irradiation technique. Little information exists as to how the hardness of restorations produced by the 2 techniques compare.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of composite resin placement and an irradiation technique on the axial hardness at various depths in a Class I composite resin to include the influence of composite resin filler classification and shade.
Cylindrical Class I preparations were made in 70 recently extracted human molars and restored with either a light (A1) or dark shade (A4) of a microfill, microhybrid, or nanohybrid composite resin, or with a single shade of a translucent material. Half were placed using a conventional 2-mm-thick incremental-fill/occlusal irradiation technique, and half using a bulk-fill/transtooth irradiation method (n=5). Specimens were sectioned occluso-apically and axial Knoop hardness values were obtained at depths of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mm. Hardness at 0.5 mm was used as a control to compare to deeper readings. Statistical analyses consisted of multiple ANOVAs and Dunnett's post-hoc tests performed at appropriately determined significance levels.
For 3 multishaded materials tested, axial hardness values were relatively unaffected by composite resin shade or filler classification for the incremental technique, but were significantly affected by these factors when using the bulk-fill/transtooth irradiation method. A single shade translucent material was not affected in either the bulk or incremental condition.
Use of a bulk-fill/transtooth irradiation technique for composite resin placement does not result in axial hardness values equivalent to that of an incremental-fill/occlusal irradiation technique.
与使用传统的分层放置/照射技术相比,使用大容量填充/穿牙复合树脂插入/照射技术可能无法使修复体聚合得同样良好。关于这两种技术所产生修复体的硬度如何比较,现有信息很少。
本研究的目的是确定复合树脂放置和照射技术对I类复合树脂不同深度处轴向硬度的影响,包括复合树脂填料分类和色度的影响。
在70颗近期拔除的人类磨牙上制备圆柱形I类洞型,并用微填料、微混合或纳米混合复合树脂的浅色(A1)或深色(A4)进行修复,或用单一色度的半透明材料修复。一半使用传统的2毫米厚分层填充/咬合面照射技术进行放置,另一半使用大容量填充/穿牙照射方法(n = 5)。标本沿咬合面-根尖方向切片,并在0.5、1.0、1.5、2.0、2.5和3.0毫米深度处获得轴向努氏硬度值。将0.5毫米处的硬度用作对照,以与更深层的读数进行比较。统计分析包括在适当确定的显著性水平下进行的多因素方差分析和Dunnett事后检验。
对于测试的3种多色度材料,分层技术的轴向硬度值相对不受复合树脂色度或填料分类的影响,但在使用大容量填充/穿牙照射方法时,这些因素会产生显著影响。单一色度的半透明材料在大容量或分层条件下均未受影响。
使用大容量填充/穿牙照射技术放置复合树脂不会产生与分层填充/咬合面照射技术相当的轴向硬度值。