Suppr超能文献

树脂复合材料与牙本质的区域微推出和微拉伸粘结强度的比较。

Comparison between regional micropush-out and microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin.

作者信息

Cekic-Nagas Isil, Ergun Gulfem, Nagas Emre, Tezvergil Arzu, Vallittu Pekka K, Lassila Lippo V J

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2008 Apr;66(2):73-81. doi: 10.1080/00016350801958266.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study we compared the micropush-out (micro-PO) and microtensile (micro-TBS) test methods for resin composites on different levels and surfaces of dentin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-four sound human molars were divided into two groups in accordance with the dentin surface used (occlusal (O) or mesio-distal (M)), then subdivided into a further two groups in accordance with the test method (micro-PO (P) or micro-TBS (T)). In groups OP and OT, teeth were ground occlusally perpendicular to their axis, and in groups MP and MT, mesio-distally parallel to their axis to expose dentin. Dentin disks were prepared from different regions of the teeth either in an occluso-cervical (group OP) (n=5) or mesio-distal direction (group MP) (n=5) (S, superficial; M, middle; D, deep). One-hundred-and-twenty standardized occlusal cavities were prepared in these dentin disks using a conical-shaped diamond rotary cutting instrument. The adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Dental Adhesive) and a composite material (Filtek Z250 Universal Restorative) were applied and polymerized with a LED light curing unit (Elipar FreeLight 2). The disks (n=20/per group) were tested in a universal testing machine and pushed out with a cross-head speed of 1.0 mm/min. In groups OT (n=12) and MT (n=12), the teeth were ground to expose superficial, middle, and deep dentin. Build-ups of resin composite were constructed with the same materials. The specimens were serially sectioned and trimmed to hour-glass shapes, then tested with the micro-TBS tester at a rate of 1 mm/min. Failure modes were examined using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

ANOVA revealed significant differences among the groups (p<0.001). With the push-out test, no premature failure occurred, the variability of the data distribution was acceptable, and regional differences in bond strength among dentin levels could be assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

The micro-PO test method could be an alternative to the micro-TBS technique.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们比较了树脂复合材料在牙本质不同层次和表面上的微推出(micro-PO)和微拉伸(micro-TBS)测试方法。

材料与方法

34颗健康人磨牙根据使用的牙本质表面(咬合面(O)或近远中面(M))分为两组,然后根据测试方法(微推出(P)或微拉伸(T))进一步细分为两组。在OP组和OT组中,牙齿沿其轴线垂直向咬合面磨除,在MP组和MT组中,沿近远中方向平行于其轴线磨除以暴露牙本质。从牙齿的不同区域制备牙本质盘,分别沿咬合-颈部方向(OP组)(n = 5)或近远中方向(MP组)(n = 5)(S,表层;M,中层;D,深层)。使用锥形金刚石旋转切割器械在这些牙本质盘中制备120个标准化的咬合面洞。应用粘合剂(Adper Scotchbond多功能牙科粘合剂)和复合材料(Filtek Z250通用修复材料),并用LED光固化装置(Elipar FreeLight 2)进行聚合。将牙本质盘(每组n = 20)在万能试验机上进行测试,以1.0 mm/min的十字头速度推出。在OT组(n = 12)和MT组(n = 12)中,将牙齿磨除以暴露表层、中层和深层牙本质。用相同材料构建树脂复合材料堆积体。将标本连续切片并修整成沙漏形状,然后用微拉伸粘结强度测试仪以1 mm/min的速率进行测试。使用体视显微镜和扫描电子显微镜检查失败模式。

结果

方差分析显示各组间存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。通过推出测试,未发生过早失败,数据分布的变异性可接受,并且可以评估牙本质各层次间粘结强度的区域差异。

结论

微推出测试方法可作为微拉伸技术的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验