Angioli Roberto, Zullo Marzio Angelo, Plotti Francesco, Bellati Filippo, Basile Stefano, Damiani Patrizio, Perniola Giorgia, Calcagno Marco, Panici Pierluigi Benedetti
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Campus Bio Medico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2):200-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.06.020. Epub 2007 Aug 10.
To describe the urologic late complications and urodynamics outcome adopting teniamyotomies technique to create a low-pressure reservoir using the cecum, ascending colon and proximal part of the transverse colon without detubularization (Rome pouch).
Twenty-eight consecutive patients affected by gynecological cancer and submitted urinary diversion with "Rome pouch" technique were included. After 3 and 12 months from the surgical procedure patients were submitted to urodynamic evaluation of the neobladders. Excretory urography was performed in all patient. Abdominal X-ray, serum electrolytes, creatinine and cultures of the reservoir are obtained during every visit. Long-term urologic complications were recorded. Patient quality of life was assessed using a 10 cm grade visual analog scale (VAS).
Urodynamics performed 12 months postoperatively showed that the mean maximum reservoir capacity was 439.9+/-58.9 cm H(2)O. The mean reservoir pressure at maximum capacity was 19.2+/-8.4 cm H(2)O (no contractive wave during the filling in any patient). The mean maximum closure pressure in the efferent tube, at maximum capacity, was 88.8+/-32.3 cm H(2)O. Continence was excellent for 26 (93%) and 23 (92%) patients at 3 and 12 months respectively. A total of 9 (32%) and 6 (24%) patients suffered late complications at 3 and 12 months follow-up respectively. However only one patient with pouch leakage underwent surgical pouch revision.
Our experience demonstrated that Rome pouch creation with multiple teniamyotomies has good capacity with low internal pressure and good continence with a low rate of late urologic complications. Thus, comparing results to those of other continent pouch models, the Rome pouch technique represents a valid alternative.
描述采用纵肌切开术,利用盲肠、升结肠和横结肠近端创建无去管化的低压储尿囊(罗马袋)技术后的泌尿系统远期并发症及尿动力学结果。
纳入28例连续的妇科癌症患者,她们接受了“罗马袋”技术的尿流改道。在手术3个月和12个月后,患者接受新膀胱的尿动力学评估。所有患者均进行排泄性尿路造影。每次随访时均进行腹部X线检查、血清电解质、肌酐检测及储尿囊培养。记录长期泌尿系统并发症。使用10厘米分级视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者生活质量。
术后12个月进行的尿动力学检查显示,平均最大储尿囊容量为439.9±58.9厘米水柱。最大容量时的平均储尿囊压力为19.2±8.4厘米水柱(所有患者在充盈过程中均无收缩波)。最大容量时,传出管的平均最大闭合压力为88.8±32.3厘米水柱。分别有26例(93%)和23例(92%)患者在3个月和12个月时控尿良好。在3个月和12个月的随访中,分别有9例(32%)和6例(24%)患者出现远期并发症。然而,只有1例储尿囊漏的患者接受了储尿囊手术修复。
我们的经验表明,采用多次纵肌切开术创建罗马袋具有良好的容量、低内压、良好的控尿能力以及较低的泌尿系统远期并发症发生率。因此,与其他大陆袋模型的结果相比,罗马袋技术是一种有效的替代方法。