Stamenović Dimitrije, Rosenblatt Noah, Montoya-Zavala Martín, Matthews Benjamin D, Hu Shaohua, Suki Béla, Wang Ning, Ingber Donald E
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, and Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Biophys J. 2007 Oct 15;93(8):L39-41. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.116582. Epub 2007 Aug 10.
The dynamic mechanical behavior of living cells has been proposed to result from timescale-invariant processes governed by the soft glass rheology theory derived from soft matter physics. But this theory is based on experimental measurements over timescales that are shorter than those most relevant for cell growth and function. Here we report results measured over a wider range of timescales which demonstrate that rheological behaviors of living cells are not timescale-invariant. These findings demonstrate that although soft glass rheology appears to accurately predict certain cell mechanical behaviors, it is not a unified model of cell rheology under biologically relevant conditions and thus, alternative mechanisms need to be considered.
有观点认为,活细胞的动态力学行为源自由软物质物理学推导而来的软玻璃流变学理论所支配的时间尺度不变过程。但该理论是基于比细胞生长和功能最相关的时间尺度更短的时间尺度上的实验测量。在此,我们报告了在更广泛的时间尺度范围内测量的结果,这些结果表明活细胞的流变行为并非时间尺度不变。这些发现表明,尽管软玻璃流变学似乎能准确预测某些细胞力学行为,但在生物学相关条件下,它并非细胞流变学的统一模型,因此,需要考虑其他机制。