Apitz Sabine E, Barbanti Andrea, Bocci Martina, Carlin Anna, Montobbio Laura, Bernstein Alberto Giulio
SEA Environmental Decisions, 1 South Cottages, The Ford, Little Hadham, Hertfordshire, SG11 2AT United Kingdom.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2007 Jul;3(3):393-414.
A number of studies carried out in recent years have shown the presence of a wide range of contaminants in the Venice Lagoon. It is important to have a good understanding of the ecological quality of Venice Lagoon sediments in order to 1) define and locate areas where a threat to the environment is present and therefore an intervention is needed (i.e., in situ assessment and management); and 2) define sustainable and environmentally correct ways of managing sediments that are to be dredged for navigational purposes or in relation to other interventions (i.e., ex situ management). This study reports on a critical comparison of chemical quality of sediments in Venice Lagoon and its subregions. Data on the Venice Lagoon were compiled from several studies conducted during the past decade on surface sediment contamination; temporal variation and risks for contaminants at depth were not addressed. The comparison of observed pollutant concentrations with local and internationally used sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) was used as a tool to benchmark different sites and for a tier I (screening) ecological risk assessment. Meaning and relevance of a number of SQGs are discussed, together with the options available for carrying out the comparison with sediment data. The screening of the Venice Lagoon sediment quality is discussed from a risk-assessment perspective and appropriate values for use in an in situ-ex situ management framework are suggested. Although there were some differences depending upon which specific SQGs were applied, different SQGs provided the same general picture of screening risk in Venice Lagoon: Although there are geographic differences, median levels for several contaminants in surface sediments exceeded a number of SQGs. Many contaminants exceed threshold effects SQGs, and Hg exceeds probable effects SQGs in most sub-basins except the southern Lagoon. Venice Lagoon south has the lowest screening risk levels, Venice Lagoon central/north has the highest (and is nearest to the Porto Marghera and Venice City Canals sites). Ranges are high in all areas, therefore any remedial or disposal decision should use site-specific data.
近年来开展的多项研究表明,威尼斯泻湖存在多种污染物。为了:1)确定和定位存在环境威胁因而需要进行干预的区域(即原位评估和管理);2)确定可持续且符合环境要求的方式来管理因航道目的或其他干预措施而需疏浚的沉积物(即异位管理),深入了解威尼斯泻湖沉积物的生态质量至关重要。本研究报告了对威尼斯泻湖及其子区域沉积物化学质量的批判性比较。关于威尼斯泻湖的数据是从过去十年中进行的几项关于表层沉积物污染的研究中汇编而来的;未涉及深度污染物的时间变化和风险。将观测到的污染物浓度与当地和国际上使用的沉积物质量准则(SQGs)进行比较,作为对不同地点进行基准测试和一级(筛选)生态风险评估的工具。讨论了一些SQGs的含义和相关性,以及与沉积物数据进行比较的可用选项。从风险评估的角度讨论了威尼斯泻湖沉积物质量的筛选,并提出了在原位 - 异位管理框架中使用的适当值。尽管根据所应用的具体SQGs存在一些差异,但不同的SQGs对威尼斯泻湖筛选风险提供了相同的总体情况:尽管存在地理差异,但表层沉积物中几种污染物的中值水平超过了一些SQGs。许多污染物超过了阈值效应SQGs,除了泻湖南部,汞在大多数子流域超过了可能效应SQGs。威尼斯泻湖南部的筛选风险水平最低,威尼斯泻湖中部/北部最高(且最靠近马尔盖拉港和威尼斯城运河站点)。所有区域的范围都很高,因此任何补救或处置决策都应使用特定地点的数据。