Stadler Christina, Rohrmann Sonja, Knopf Andrea, Poustka Fritz
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters der Universitätsklinik, Frankfurt/Main.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2007 May;35(3):169-77; quiz 177-8. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917.35.3.169.
The study explores whether conduct-disordered children differ from healthy children in reference to their moral development and to what extent cognitive and education factors, respectively psychosocial stress factors mediate the level of socio-moral development.
Sixteen boys aged nine to fourteen years with an ICD-10 diagnosis of Conduct Disorder were compared to sixteen age-matched healthy controls. The level of socio-moral maturity was assessed by means of the German version of the Sociomoral Reflection Measure (Gibbs et al., 1992).
Results show that conduct-disordered boys tended to differ from their healthy counterparts in terms of the level of socio-moral maturity of judgement. According to the theory of Gibbs and co-workers, the moral judgement of healthy children (characterized by a pro-social and mutually moral attitude) is more mature than that of conduct-disordered boys. While the latter remain at an interim level between immature and mature socio-moral reasoning, the former adhere to more rational, exchange-oriented morals. The factors "intelligence" and "maternal support" exercise a decisive influence on socio-moral development.
It should be investigated whether or not the current results can be generalized in a larger sample.
本研究探讨品行障碍儿童在道德发展方面是否与健康儿童存在差异,以及认知和教育因素以及心理社会应激因素分别在多大程度上介导社会道德发展水平。
将16名年龄在9至14岁、国际疾病分类第10版诊断为品行障碍的男孩与16名年龄匹配的健康对照进行比较。社会道德成熟水平通过德文版的社会道德反思测量工具(吉布斯等人,1992年)进行评估。
结果表明,品行障碍男孩在社会道德判断成熟水平方面往往与健康对照存在差异。根据吉布斯及其同事的理论,健康儿童的道德判断(以亲社会和相互道德的态度为特征)比品行障碍男孩更成熟。后者停留在不成熟和成熟社会道德推理之间的过渡水平,而前者坚持更理性、以交换为导向的道德观念。“智力”和“母亲支持”因素对社会道德发展具有决定性影响。
应研究当前结果是否能在更大样本中得到推广。