Nissinen Markku J, Gylling Helena, Miettinen Tatu A
Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Br J Nutr. 2008 Feb;99(2):370-8. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507811998. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
Serum ratios to cholesterol of lathosterol, and of cholestanol, campesterol and sitosterol measure respective relative cholesterol synthesis and absorption, but their clinical applicability is not known in evaluation of cholesterol metabolism under different dietary conditions. We compared relative synthesis and absorption of cholesterol to the respective absolute ones in healthy male volunteers (n 29) on four subsequent diets: baseline home (HD), low-cholesterol low-fat (LCLF), high-cholesterol low-fat (HCLF) and low-cholesterol high-fat (LCHF). Serum lipids, lipoproteins, sterols, fractional cholesterol absorption and sterol synthesis were examined. HCLF and LCHF decreased fractional cholesterol absorption by approximately 23-27 % from baseline HD (P < 0.05) and increased the levels of total and LDL-cholesterol in serum from LCLF by approximately 9-14 % (P < 0.05). On HCLF, bile acid synthesis was high (P < 0.05 for each), and absolute cholesterol synthesis tended to be higher than on HD and LCHF (NS). Relative synthesis was positively associated with absolute cholesterol synthesis, but inversely with relative absorption during each diet (P < 0.05). The relative absorption markers were interrelated in each diet, and were also associated with fractional absorption of cholesterol in each diet but HD. In conclusion, relative markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis reflect changes in cholesterol metabolism despite the amount of dietary fat and cholesterol consumed, but their validity with this respect is strengthened by controlled diets in metabolic studies. Additions of cholesterol and fat to a diet low in fat and cholesterol cause practically equal changes in the serum lipid profiles, whereas synthesis of cholesterol (NS) and bile acids (P < 0.05) were higher with the high-cholesterol feeding.
羊毛甾醇、胆甾烷醇、菜油甾醇和谷甾醇与胆固醇的血清比值分别衡量相对胆固醇合成和吸收情况,但在评估不同饮食条件下的胆固醇代谢时,其临床适用性尚不清楚。我们比较了29名健康男性志愿者在随后四种饮食(基线家庭饮食[HD]、低胆固醇低脂肪饮食[LCLF]、高胆固醇低脂肪饮食[HCLF]和低胆固醇高脂肪饮食[LCHF])下胆固醇的相对合成和吸收与各自的绝对合成和吸收情况。检测了血清脂质、脂蛋白、甾醇、胆固醇分数吸收和甾醇合成。HCLF和LCHF使胆固醇分数吸收较基线HD降低约23 - 27%(P < 0.05),并使血清总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平较LCLF升高约9 - 14%(P < 0.05)。在HCLF饮食下,胆汁酸合成较高(每种情况P < 0.05),绝对胆固醇合成倾向于高于HD和LCHF饮食(无显著性差异)。相对合成与绝对胆固醇合成呈正相关,但在每种饮食期间与相对吸收呈负相关(P < 0.05)。在每种饮食中,相对吸收标志物相互关联,且除HD饮食外,在每种饮食中也与胆固醇分数吸收相关。总之,尽管摄入的膳食脂肪和胆固醇量不同,但胆固醇吸收和合成的相对标志物反映了胆固醇代谢的变化,不过在代谢研究中,通过控制饮食可增强其在这方面的有效性。在低脂肪和低胆固醇饮食中添加胆固醇和脂肪会使血清脂质谱发生几乎相同的变化,而高胆固醇饮食时胆固醇(无显著性差异)和胆汁酸(P < 0.05)的合成较高。