• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不使用球囊血管成形术和远端保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术:100例初步经验。

Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: preliminary experience in 100 cases.

作者信息

Maynar M, Baldi S, Rostagno R, Zander T, Rabellino M, Llorens R, Alvarez J, Barajas F

机构信息

Department of Endovascular Therapy, Hospiten Rambla Hospital, Tenerife, Spain.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Aug;28(7):1378-83. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0543.

DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A0543
PMID:17698546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7977659/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven consecutive patients with 100 carotid stenoses compose this series. Ninety four of the 100 hundred stented carotid arteries were either symptomatic (58 [58%]) or had a greater than 70% stenosis (36 [36%]). Six percent of them were asymptomatic and had stenosis between 50% and 70%. Patients underwent neurologic evaluation before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Carotid sonography and plain films of the neck were performed immediately after the procedure and then at the same time intervals.

RESULTS

Primary stent placement was successful in 98 of 100 case subjects. In 2 case subjects, predilation was necessary before stent deployment. Neurologic periprocedural complications included 1 nondisabling and 1 disabling stroke and 5 transient ischemic attacks. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 months (range: 10-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were 5 deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major stroke. The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 78.85% before the procedure to a mean of 21.23% immediately after.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices was safe and effective with a low incidence of periprocedural complications.

摘要

背景与目的

颈动脉支架置入过程中的一个主要担忧是发生脑栓塞的可能性。减少器械在病变部位的操作次数可能会降低手术中风风险。为此,我们报告了在不使用球囊血管成形术或远端保护装置的情况下进行颈动脉支架置入的初步经验。

材料与方法

本系列包括连续87例患有100处颈动脉狭窄的患者。100条接受支架置入的颈动脉中,94条要么有症状(58条[58%]),要么狭窄程度大于70%(36条[36%])。其中6%无症状,狭窄程度在50%至70%之间。患者在手术前以及术后1、3、6和12个月及之后每年进行神经学评估。术后立即以及随后在相同时间间隔进行颈动脉超声检查和颈部平片检查。

结果

100例受试者中有98例首次支架置入成功。2例受试者在支架置入前需要进行预扩张。围手术期神经学并发症包括1例非致残性中风、1例致残性中风和5例短暂性脑缺血发作。平均随访时间为23个月(范围:10 - 36个月)。随访期间有5例死亡,均与颈动脉疾病无关,且无重大中风发生。狭窄程度从术前平均78.85%降至术后立即平均21.23%。

结论

在本系列中,不使用球囊血管成形术或远端保护装置进行颈动脉支架置入是安全有效的,围手术期并发症发生率低。

相似文献

1
Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: preliminary experience in 100 cases.不使用球囊血管成形术和远端保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术:100例初步经验。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Aug;28(7):1378-83. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0543.
2
Unprotected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis: results and long-term follow-up in a single-center experience.症状性重度狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术:单中心经验的结果和长期随访。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Aug;33(7):1285-91. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2951. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
3
Carotid angioplasty and stenting without protection devices: safety and efficacy concerns--single center experience.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术无保护装置:安全性和疗效的担忧——单中心经验。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2011 Jun;21(2):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00062-011-0057-6. Epub 2011 May 12.
4
Clinical predictors of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death within 30 days of carotid artery stent placement with distal balloon protection.采用远端球囊保护技术进行颈动脉支架置入术后30天内短暂性脑缺血发作、中风或死亡的临床预测因素。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Jan;20(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
5
Carotid artery stenting without angioplasty and cerebral protection: a single-center experience with up to 7 years' follow-up.颈动脉支架置入术不伴血管成形术和脑保护:一项长达 7 年随访的单中心经验。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):759-63. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2375. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
6
Efficacy of treatment of severe carotid bifurcation stenosis by using self-expanding stents without deliberate use of angioplasty balloons.使用自膨式支架治疗重度颈动脉分叉狭窄且不刻意使用血管成形术球囊的疗效。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 May;26(5):1241-8.
7
Carotid artery stenting in a vascular surgery practice.血管外科实践中的颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar;35(3):430-4. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121209.
8
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
9
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.原发性颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术对比
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
10
Double Filtration During Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Novel Post-Dilation Balloon With Integrated Embolic Protection.双重过滤颈动脉支架置入术:一种新型后置扩张球囊联合内置栓塞保护装置
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.039.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug response testing for elective carotid artery stenting: Prevalence of non-response to aspirin and clopidogrel and influence on post-interventional occurrence of cerebral ischemia.选择性颈动脉支架置入术的药物反应测试:阿司匹林和氯吡格雷无反应的发生率及其对介入后脑缺血发生的影响。
Neuroradiol J. 2025 Aug 29:19714009251372360. doi: 10.1177/19714009251372360.
2
A Case of Delayed-Onset Stent-Induced Dissection of the Internal Carotid Artery After Stenting for Near-Occlusion.一例支架置入治疗颈内动脉近闭塞后迟发性支架诱导的颈内动脉夹层病例
Cureus. 2025 May 10;17(5):e83855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83855. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Carotid artery stenting for symptomatic carotid near occlusions: Feasibility, safety and outcome analysis.症状性颈动脉近闭塞病变的颈动脉支架置入术:可行性、安全性及结果分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct 21:15910199241292387. doi: 10.1177/15910199241292387.
4
Delayed Iatrogenic Dissection Caused by a Carotid Stent: A Case Report.颈动脉支架导致的迟发性医源性夹层:一例报告
NMC Case Rep J. 2021 Jun 12;8(1):241-245. doi: 10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2020-0258. eCollection 2021.
5
Carotid Revascularization with and without the Use of an Embolic Protection Device: A Single-Center Experience from Pakistan.使用和不使用栓子保护装置的颈动脉血运重建:来自巴基斯坦的单中心经验。
Interv Neurol. 2018 Oct;7(6):378-388. doi: 10.1159/000489711. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
6
Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉疾病支架置入术后选择性扩张与标准扩张的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May;38(5):999-1005. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5103. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
Locking between a cerebral protection device and a stent-delivering catheter during carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中脑保护装置与支架输送导管之间的锁定
Interv Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):100-5. doi: 10.15274/INR-2014-10015. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
8
Carotid artery stenting: review of technique and update of recent literature.颈动脉支架置入术:技术综述与近期文献更新
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013 Sep;30(3):288-96. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1353482.
9
Distal protection filter device efficacy with carotid artery stenting: comparison between a distal protection filter and a distal protection balloon.远端保护滤器装置在颈动脉支架置入术中的疗效:远端保护滤器与远端保护球囊的比较。
Jpn J Radiol. 2013 Jan;31(1):45-9. doi: 10.1007/s11604-012-0145-9. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
10
Unprotected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis: results and long-term follow-up in a single-center experience.症状性重度狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术:单中心经验的结果和长期随访。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Aug;33(7):1285-91. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2951. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Silent ischemia after neuroprotected percutaneous carotid stenting: a diffusion-weighted MRI study.神经保护下经皮颈动脉支架置入术后的无症状性缺血:一项扩散加权磁共振成像研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Jun-Jul;27(6):1338-45.
2
Efficacy of treatment of severe carotid bifurcation stenosis by using self-expanding stents without deliberate use of angioplasty balloons.使用自膨式支架治疗重度颈动脉分叉狭窄且不刻意使用血管成形术球囊的疗效。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 May;26(5):1241-8.
3
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.高危患者中颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1493-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040127.
4
Use of a large angioplasty balloon for predilation is a risk factor for embolic complications in protected carotid stenting.在有保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术中,使用大血管成形术球囊进行预扩张是发生栓塞并发症的一个危险因素。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2004 Jul;44(7):337-42; discussion 343. doi: 10.2176/nmc.44.337.
5
Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting: the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study.颈动脉斑块回声增强增加颈动脉支架置入术中的卒中风险:颈动脉血管成形术影像与卒中风险(ICAROS)研究
Circulation. 2004 Aug 10;110(6):756-62. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138103.91187.E3. Epub 2004 Jul 26.
6
Complication with an embolic protection device during carotid angioplasty.颈动脉血管成形术期间使用栓子保护装置的并发症。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Jun;62(2):234-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20061.
7
Reporting standards for carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的报告标准。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 May;15(5):421-2. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000128204.73150.c8.
8
Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry.全球颈动脉支架注册研究的更新综述。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Oct;60(2):259-66. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10645.
9
Focal ischemia of the brain after neuroprotected carotid artery stenting.神经保护下颈动脉支架置入术后的局灶性脑缺血
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Sep 17;42(6):1007-13. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00901-x.
10
Editorial comment--Carotid artery stenting with or without protection devices? Strong opinions, poor evidence!编者按——颈动脉支架置入术:使用或不使用保护装置?观点鲜明,证据不足!
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):1941-3. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000080938.80364.75. Epub 2003 Jul 3.