Suppr超能文献

颈动脉支架置入术不伴血管成形术和脑保护:一项长达 7 年随访的单中心经验。

Carotid artery stenting without angioplasty and cerebral protection: a single-center experience with up to 7 years' follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Endovascular Therapy, Hospiten Rambla Hospital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):759-63. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2375. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The use of cerebral protection during CAS in the treatment of carotid artery disease is matter of controversy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of CASWBAP in a large cohort of patients, with ≤7 years' follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred thirty-six patients with 255 symptomatic carotid stenoses and/or with high-risk-morphology plaques of >50% and asymptomatic plaques of >70% were prospectively identified. Patients underwent neurologic and carotid US examination before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Plain films of the neck were obtained immediately after the procedure and then at 1 and 3 months.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 253/255 (99%) patients. Primary stent placement was successful in 248/253 (98%) patients. Neurologic periprocedural complications within 30 days included 1 (0.4%) nondisabling stroke, 1 (0.4%) disabling stroke, 11 (4.3%) TIAs, and 1 (0.4%) death. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 ± 1.4 months (range, 3-84 months). During the follow-up period, there were 9 additional deaths (7 unrelated to the carotid disease and 2 stroke-related) and 2 strokes (in other vascular territories). The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 82% before the procedure to a mean of 30% immediately after. During follow-up, 38 (14.8%) angioplasties were performed due to restenosis in 19 (7.4%) patients, lack of stent expansion in 14 (5.4%), or both in 5 (1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

CASWBAP is effective and safe with a low incidence of periprocedural complications, providing satisfactory long-term clinical results.

摘要

背景与目的

在颈动脉疾病的治疗中使用脑保护仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是评估在 236 例患者中应用颈动脉支架成形术(CASWBAP)的结果,这些患者的随访时间为 7 年。

材料与方法

前瞻性地选择了 255 例症状性颈动脉狭窄和/或具有>50%高危形态斑块和无症状性斑块>70%的患者。患者在术前和术后 1、3、6、12 个月及此后每年进行神经学和颈动脉 US 检查。术后即刻及术后 1 个月和 3 个月进行颈部平片检查。

结果

255 例患者中的 253 例(99%)获得了技术上的成功。248 例患者(98%)的支架初次放置成功。术后 30 天内发生了 1 例(0.4%)非致残性卒中和 1 例(0.4%)致残性卒、11 例(4.3%)短暂性脑缺血发作和 1 例(0.4%)死亡。平均随访时间为 23 ± 1.4 个月(范围:3-84 个月)。随访期间,又有 9 例死亡(7 例与颈动脉疾病无关,2 例与卒中有关)和 2 例卒中(其他血管区域)。狭窄程度从术前的平均 82%下降至术后即刻的平均 30%。在随访期间,由于 19 例患者(7.4%)出现再狭窄、14 例患者(5.4%)支架扩张不良或两者均存在于 5 例患者(1.9%)中,共进行了 38 次血管成形术。

结论

CASWBAP 有效且安全,围手术期并发症发生率低,提供了令人满意的长期临床结果。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenting without angioplasty and cerebral protection: a single-center experience with up to 7 years' follow-up.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):759-63. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2375. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
4
Carotid angioplasty and stenting without protection devices: safety and efficacy concerns--single center experience.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2011 Jun;21(2):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00062-011-0057-6. Epub 2011 May 12.
6
Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal is a safe technique for high-risk patients older than 70 years.
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):978-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.084. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
7
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
8
Safety and efficacy of carotid angioplasty/stenting in 100 consecutive high surgical risk patients: immediate and long-term follow-up.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008 Oct-Nov;42(5):433-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574408318477. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
9
Outcomes of 1000 Carotid Wallstent Implantations: Single-Center Experience.
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Apr;23(2):267-74. doi: 10.1177/1526602815626558. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
10
Carotid artery stenting: findings based on 8 years' experience.
Radiol Med. 2009 Feb;114(1):95-110. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0326-x. Epub 2008 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid artery stenting without embolic protection: A randomized multicenter trial (the CASWEP trial).
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Aug;29(4):419-425. doi: 10.1177/15910199221094388. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
3
Poststent ballooning during transcarotid artery revascularization.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):2041-2049.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.071. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Intentional Stent Stenosis to Prevent Hyperperfusion Syndrome after Carotid Artery Stenting for Extremely High-Grade Stenosis.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):132-137. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6853. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
Comparison of short-term outcomes after carotid artery stenting according to different stent designs.
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9(2):121-5. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.35445. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
7
Locking between a cerebral protection device and a stent-delivering catheter during carotid artery stenting.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):100-5. doi: 10.15274/INR-2014-10015. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
8
Risk factors for developing large emboli following carotid artery stenting.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013 Mar;53(3):155-60. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2013.53.3.155. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
9
Complications of carotid angioplasty and stenting.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Aug;33(7):E109. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3213. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
5
Predictors and timing of hypotension and bradycardia after carotid artery stenting.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Nov;29(10):1942-7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1258. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
7
8
Distal protection: maybe less than you think.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Mar;29(3):407-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0879. Epub 2007 Dec 13.
10
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061752.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验