Suppr超能文献

传统结肠镜检查失败后行双气囊结肠镜检查:使用一种新器械的初步系列研究

Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument.

作者信息

Gay G, Delvaux M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases, Hôpitaux de Brabois, CHU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2007 Sep;39(9):788-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966753.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The endoscopes that were developed for double-balloon enteroscopy have been successfully used in cases of failed colonoscopy. This study was a pilot series in which a new colonoscope was tested that utilized this double-balloon principle.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 29 patients (5 men, 24 women; mean age 54 years) in whom conventional colonoscopy had failed were included in this study. Both the failed colonoscopy and the double-balloon colonoscopy procedures were performed under general anesthesia, the usual practice in France. A prototype instrument (working length 152 cm, diameter 9.4 mm) designed to incorporate the principles of double-balloon enteroscopy was used. The completeness of colonoscopy was assessed according to conventional criteria by the achievement of a stable position in the cecum. The indicatons for the procedure, the time to reach the cecum, the need for fluoroscopic control, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

The previous colonoscopy failed due adhesions (n = 16), or to long or fixed loops (n = 13). Complete colonoscopy using the balloon method was achieved in 28/29 patients, taking an average time of 18 +/- 14 minutes; a long sigmoid loop limited the examination to the left flexure in one patient. Balloon colonoscopy using double-balloon methodology was used in 24 patients and the instrument was used without an overtube (i. e. using a single-balloon technique) in five patients. Fluoroscopy was used in 16 patients to monitor endoscope progression. No complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Double-balloon colonoscopy enables full colonic examination in almost all patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy. The overtube should be used in most cases. The use of fluoroscopic assessment of scope progression could be reduced further with increasing experience.

摘要

背景与研究目的

为双气囊小肠镜检查研发的内镜已成功应用于结肠镜检查失败的病例。本研究是一个试点系列研究,对一种采用双气囊原理的新型结肠镜进行了测试。

患者与方法

本研究纳入了29例(5例男性,24例女性;平均年龄54岁)常规结肠镜检查失败的患者。失败的结肠镜检查和双气囊结肠镜检查均在全身麻醉下进行,这是法国的常规做法。使用了一种设计为纳入双气囊小肠镜检查原理的原型器械(工作长度152厘米,直径9.4毫米)。根据在盲肠中达到稳定位置这一常规标准评估结肠镜检查的完整性。记录手术指征、到达盲肠的时间、是否需要荧光透视控制以及不良事件。

结果

先前的结肠镜检查因粘连(n = 16)、长或固定的肠袢(n = 13)而失败。29例患者中有28例使用气囊法完成了结肠镜检查,平均用时18±14分钟;1例患者因乙状结肠长袢而仅检查至左曲部。24例患者使用了双气囊法进行气囊结肠镜检查,5例患者未使用外套管(即使用单气囊技术)使用该器械。16例患者使用荧光透视监测内镜推进。未报告并发症。

结论

双气囊结肠镜检查能够使几乎所有先前结肠镜检查未完成的患者进行全结肠检查。大多数情况下应使用外套管。随着经验的增加,荧光透视评估内镜推进的使用可进一步减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验