Morton Darren P, Callister Robin
Avondale Centre for Exercise Sciences, Avondale College, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2008 Nov;11(6):569-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
Skeletal muscle cramp has been proposed as the aetiology of exercise-related transient abdominal pain (ETAP). The aim of this study was to determine whether or not localised electromyographic (EMG) activity indicative of skeletal muscle cramp is elevated during ETAP. Surface EMG activity was quantified at the site of ETAP in 14 symptomatic individuals (ETAP group) while the pain was present and after the pain subsided. Additionally, measurements were taken in another 14 subjects (Comparison group) who performed the same experimental procedure but did not experience ETAP. In the ETAP group, localised EMG activity did not increase when the pain was present or decrease when the pain subsided. The level of EMG activity detected while the pain was present was indistinguishable from noise (0.20+/-0.18microV). No difference was observed between the ETAP and Comparison groups in the level of localised EMG activity (p=0.89) at any time. After the pain subsided in the ETAP group, EMG activity was recorded at the site of the pain while the subjects performed a diaphragm-dependent sniff manoeuvre (8.3+/-0.7microV) and a maximum voluntary contraction of the abdominal muscles (17.5+/-0.7microV). It was concluded that ETAP is not associated with elevated EMG activity, suggesting that the pain is not the result of muscle cramping.
骨骼肌痉挛被认为是运动相关短暂性腹痛(ETAP)的病因。本研究的目的是确定在ETAP期间,指示骨骼肌痉挛的局部肌电图(EMG)活动是否升高。在14名有症状的个体(ETAP组)的ETAP部位,于疼痛出现时和疼痛消退后对表面EMG活动进行量化。此外,对另外14名受试者(对照组)进行测量,他们执行相同的实验程序但未经历ETAP。在ETAP组中,疼痛出现时局部EMG活动未增加,疼痛消退时也未减少。疼痛出现时检测到的EMG活动水平与噪声无法区分(0.20±0.18微伏)。在任何时候,ETAP组和对照组之间的局部EMG活动水平均未观察到差异(p = 0.89)。在ETAP组疼痛消退后,当受试者进行依赖膈肌的吸气动作(8.3±0.7微伏)和腹部肌肉最大自主收缩(17.5±0.7微伏)时,在疼痛部位记录EMG活动。得出的结论是,ETAP与EMG活动升高无关,这表明疼痛不是肌肉痉挛的结果。