Jacob Abraham, Bortman Jared S, Robinson Lawrence L, Yu Lianbo, Dodson Edward E, Welling D Bradley
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Oct;28(7):934-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31814619bd.
To calculate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rates for translabyrinthine (TL), middle cranial fossa (MCF), and retrosigmoid/suboccipital (SO) craniotomies performed for removal of vestibular schwannoma (VS) and analyze whether packing the eustachian tube (ET) in TL VS resections impacts CSF rhinorrhea rates.
Retrospective.
Tertiary care center.
Chart review.
Three hundred fifty-nine VS resections were reviewed in 356 patients ranging from 10 to 86 years of age. Two hundred thirty-one TL, 70 MCF, 53 SO, and 5 combined TL/SO procedures were analyzed. Total CSF leak rates (incisional, otorrhea, and rhinorrhea) were 14.2% for TL, 11.4% for MCF, and 13.2% for SO approaches. Differences in overall CSF leak rates were not statistically significant. For those who underwent TL craniotomies, 2 groups of patients were identified based on whether their ETs were packed during surgery. In 1 group, the incus was removed, the aditus enlarged, the ET packed, and the middle ear filled with muscle. In the second group, the aditus, epitympanum and middle ear were packed without removing the incus, and the ET was not packed. Of 148 patients who had their ET packed, 12 developed CSF rhinorrhea (8.1%). The CSF rhinorrhea rate for patients who did not have ET packing was 5.9% (3 of 51 patients). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.80). When Proplast was used to pack the ET (121 patients), the CSF rhinorrhea rate was 5.8%. Unfortunately, this material extruded in 4 of 121 patients (3.3%) and presented clinically as delayed purulent otorrhea.
Cerebrospinal fluid leak rates were similar in patients undergoing TL, SO, and MCF approaches, and CSF rhinorrhea was not decreased by ET packing. Patients whose ETs are packed with Proplast are at risk for extrusion and otorrhea years after their initial VS resection.
计算为切除前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)而进行的经迷路(TL)、中颅窝(MCF)和乙状窦后/枕下(SO)开颅手术的脑脊液(CSF)漏出率,并分析在TL VS切除术中填塞咽鼓管(ET)是否会影响脑脊液鼻漏发生率。
回顾性研究。
三级医疗中心。
病历回顾。
对356例年龄在10至86岁之间的患者的359例VS切除术进行了回顾。分析了231例TL、70例MCF、53例SO以及5例联合TL/SO手术。总的CSF漏出率(切口漏、耳漏和鼻漏),TL入路为14.2%,MCF入路为11.4%,SO入路为13.2%。总体CSF漏出率的差异无统计学意义。对于接受TL开颅手术的患者,根据手术中是否填塞ET将患者分为两组。一组切除砧骨,扩大鼓窦入口,填塞ET,并在中耳填充肌肉。另一组在不切除砧骨的情况下填塞鼓窦入口、上鼓室和中耳,且不填塞ET。在148例填塞ET的患者中,12例发生脑脊液鼻漏(8.1%)。未填塞ET的患者脑脊液鼻漏发生率为5.9%(51例患者中有3例)。这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.80)。当使用普洛普拉斯(Proplast)填塞ET时(121例患者),脑脊液鼻漏发生率为5.8%。不幸的是,该材料在121例患者中有4例发生挤出(3.3%),临床表现为迟发性化脓性耳漏。
接受TL、SO和MCF入路手术的患者脑脊液漏出率相似,填塞ET并不会降低脑脊液鼻漏发生率。用普洛普拉斯填塞ET的患者在初次VS切除术后数年有材料挤出和耳漏的风险。