Dai Wei-Guo, Dong Liang C, Shi Xinfeng, Nguyen Joe, Evans Juli, Xu Yaodong, Creasey Abla A
ALZA Corporation, 1900 Charleston Road, Mountain View, California 94039, USA.
J Pharm Sci. 2007 Nov;96(11):2957-69. doi: 10.1002/jps.20886.
A precipitation screening method using a 96-well microtiter plate was developed to evaluate in vitro drug precipitation kinetics of liquid formulations for poorly water-soluble compounds, using milligram quantities of compounds and milliliter volumes of biorelevant media. By using this method we identified three formulations showing distinct in vitro precipitation kinetics (fast, slow, and no precipitation) for a model new molecular entity (JNJ-25894934). The in vitro precipitation profiles in simulated intestinal fluid (SIF), fasted state simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF), and fed state simulated intestinal fluid (FeSSIF) were compared with those measured by a USP dissolution method, and with in vivo absorption at the fasted and fed states in canine pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. The precipitation kinetics of all three formulations in the initial hours measured by the screening method correlated to those determined by the USP method (R(2) = 0.96). The PK results showed that the fast-precipitation formulation had the lowest bioavailability. However, a similar bioavailability was observed for the slow- and no-precipitation formulations. The oral bioavailability of JNJ-25894934 at the fed state was also significantly higher than that at the fasted state for all three formulations (p < 0.05). In addition, the in vitro precipitation profiles in FeSSIF correlated better with in vivo absorption than those in SIF and FaSSIF.
开发了一种使用96孔微量滴定板的沉淀筛选方法,以评估难溶性化合物液体制剂的体外药物沉淀动力学,该方法使用毫克量的化合物和毫升体积的生物相关介质。通过使用该方法,我们确定了三种制剂,它们对一种新型分子实体(JNJ-25894934)表现出不同的体外沉淀动力学(快速、缓慢和无沉淀)。将模拟肠液(SIF)、禁食状态模拟肠液(FaSSIF)和进食状态模拟肠液(FeSSIF)中的体外沉淀曲线与通过美国药典溶出度方法测得的曲线以及犬药代动力学(PK)研究中禁食和进食状态下的体内吸收情况进行了比较。通过筛选方法在最初几小时测得的所有三种制剂的沉淀动力学与通过美国药典方法测定的动力学相关(R(2)=0.96)。PK结果表明,快速沉淀制剂的生物利用度最低。然而,缓慢沉淀和无沉淀制剂的生物利用度相似。对于所有三种制剂,JNJ-25894934在进食状态下的口服生物利用度也显著高于禁食状态(p<0.05)。此外,FeSSIF中的体外沉淀曲线与体内吸收的相关性比SIF和FaSSIF中的更好。