Bi Hong-sheng, Ma Xiao-hua, Li Jing-hai, Ji Peng
Eye Center, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250002, China.
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 May;43(5):407-11.
To evaluate binocular function in the early stage after implantation of multifocal intraocular lens.
Three weeks postoperatively, simultaneous perception, fusion, near and far-distance stereoacuity, visual acuity and visual symptoms were observed in 31 cases (46 eyes) with multifocal intraocular lens implantation (MIOL) [MIOL group, in which 16 cases with unilateral implantation (Ms) and 15 cases with bilateral implantation (Md)] and 32 cases (47 eyes) with single-focal intraocular lens implantation (SIOL) [SIOL group, in which 17 cases with unilateral implantation (Ss) and 15 cases with bilateral implantation (Sd)].
All patients obtained simultaneous perception and fusion sense, there was no significantly statistical difference between these two group (P > 0.05). Foveal far-distance stereoacuity was established in 38.7% cases among MIOL group (12/31) and 40.6% in SIOL group (13/32), with no statistically significant difference between these two groups (P > 0.05). Foveal near-distance stereoacuity was established in 41.9% MIOL cases (13/31) and in 15.6% SIOL group (5/32), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Foveal near and far-distance stereoacuity of either Ms and Md or Ss and Sd revealed no significantly statistical difference (P > 0.05). Two patients (6.5%) with MIOL in only one eye complained glare at night, others were satisfied. The stereopsis visual performance such as the quality of vision during eating, up-and-down stairs was improved in MIOL group [80.6% (25/31)] and in SIOL group [56.2% (18/32)], the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
There is a complete recovery of binocular vision in the early post-operative stage of MIOL implantation as compared with the normal value of aged people. Foveal near and far-distance stereoacuity after bilateral and unilateral implantation of either MIOL or SIOL revealed no statistically significant difference. Foveal near-distance stereopsis acuity of MIOL group was improved more quickly than that of SIOL group. MIOL has distinct advantage in providing whole-distance visual acuity and stereoacuity.
评估多焦点人工晶状体植入术后早期的双眼视功能。
术后3周,观察31例(46眼)多焦点人工晶状体植入术患者(多焦点人工晶状体组,其中单眼植入16例,双眼植入15例)和32例(47眼)单焦点人工晶状体植入术患者(单焦点人工晶状体组,其中单眼植入17例,双眼植入15例)的同时视、融合功能、近远立体视锐度、视力及视觉症状。
所有患者均获得同时视和融合感,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多焦点人工晶状体组38.7%(12/31)的患者建立了黄斑中心凹远立体视锐度,单焦点人工晶状体组为40.6%(13/32),两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多焦点人工晶状体组41.9%(13/31)的患者建立了黄斑中心凹近立体视锐度,单焦点人工晶状体组为15.6%(5/32),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单眼植入多焦点人工晶状体组与双眼植入多焦点人工晶状体组、单眼植入单焦点人工晶状体组与双眼植入单焦点人工晶状体组的黄斑中心凹近远立体视锐度差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多焦点人工晶状体组中2例(6.5%)单眼植入患者诉夜间眩光,其余患者均满意。多焦点人工晶状体组[80.6%(25/31)]和单焦点人工晶状体组[56.2%(18/32)]在进食、上下楼梯等视功能质量方面的立体视表现均有改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
与老年人正常值相比,多焦点人工晶状体植入术后早期双眼视功能可完全恢复。多焦点人工晶状体和单焦点人工晶状体单眼及双眼植入后黄斑中心凹近远立体视锐度差异无统计学意义。多焦点人工晶状体组黄斑中心凹近立体视锐度较单焦点人工晶状体组恢复更快。多焦点人工晶状体在提供全程视力和立体视方面具有明显优势。