Chen Wei-Rong, Meng Qian-Li, Yang Wen-Hui, Ye Hai-Yun, Liu Yi-Zhi
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;45(11):1004-9.
To evaluate the visual quality after combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (MIOLs) in both eyes (CustomMatch pattern).
Prospective, nonrandomized study. Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun yat-sen university, P.R. China. Age-related cataract patients, selected according to the inclusion criteria and divided into MIOL group and monofocal intraocular lens (SIOL) group, received phacoemulsification and were implanted with combined a ReZoom NXG1 IOL in the dominant eye and a Tecnis ZM900 IOL in the fellow eye or bilateral Sensar AR40e IOLs. Monocular and binocular testing one month after surgery included uncorrected and best-spectacle corrected visual acuity at far, intermediate and near distances under 100 cd/m(2) and 6 cd/m(2), reading visual acuity and reading speed, defocus curve, and subjective vision-related quality of life using questionnaire.
Under 100 cd/m(2) and 6 cd/m(2), binocular mean uncorrected visual acuity at 500 cm in MIOL group was logMAR 0.013 +/- 0.149 and logMAR 0.163 +/- 0.220 and binocular mean best-spectacle corrected visual acuity was logMAR -0.027 +/- 0.092 and logMAR 0.109 +/- 0.175 respectively. The mean refraction spherical equivalent for best distance corrected visual acuity was (-0.18 +/- 0.85) D and (-0.32 +/- 0.90) D respectively. Under 100 cd/m(2), better uncorrected visual acuity (decimal 0.63) at 40 cm, 63 cm and 100 cm was achieved in MIOL group. Under 6 cd/m(2), the uncorrected visual acuities in MIOL group at 40 cm and 63 cm distance were significantly higher than those in SIOL group although there were no statistically difference at 100 cm. Uncorrected reading visual acuity and reading speed in MIOL group were better than those in SIOL group, while the results in reading ability were similar when MIOL group without correction compared with SIOL group with correction. The depth of focus was 5.5 diopter in MIOL group. No patient in both groups wore glasses for distance and 70% patients in MIOL group did not need to wear glasses for intermediate and near distances after surgery.
CustomMatch pattern could provide a satisfactory vision at a full range of near, intermediate and far distance and improve the life quality to a certain extent.
评估双眼联合植入折射型和衍射型多焦点人工晶状体(MIOL)(CustomMatch模式)后的视觉质量。
前瞻性、非随机研究。中国中山大学中山眼科中心。根据纳入标准选择年龄相关性白内障患者,分为MIOL组和单焦点人工晶状体(SIOL)组,接受白内障超声乳化手术,并在主眼植入ReZoom NXG1人工晶状体,在对侧眼植入Tecnis ZM900人工晶状体,或双眼植入Sensar AR40e人工晶状体。术后1个月进行单眼和双眼测试,包括在100 cd/m²和6 cd/m²光照条件下的远、中、近距离未矫正和最佳眼镜矫正视力、阅读视力和阅读速度、散焦曲线,以及使用问卷评估主观视觉相关生活质量。
在100 cd/m²和6 cd/m²光照条件下,MIOL组在500 cm处的双眼平均未矫正视力分别为logMAR 0.013±0.149和logMAR 0.163±0.220,双眼平均最佳眼镜矫正视力分别为logMAR -0.027±0.092和logMAR 0.109±0.175。最佳距离矫正视力的平均等效球镜度分别为(-0.18±0.85)D和(-0.32±0.90)D。在100 cd/m²光照条件下,MIOL组在40 cm、63 cm和100 cm处的未矫正视力更好(小数视力0.63)。在6 cd/m²光照条件下,MIOL组在40 cm和63 cm距离处的未矫正视力显著高于SIOL组,尽管在100 cm处无统计学差异。MIOL组的未矫正阅读视力和阅读速度优于SIOL组,而MIOL组未矫正时的阅读能力结果与SIOL组矫正时相似。MIOL组的焦深为5.5屈光度。两组均无患者术后需要佩戴远用眼镜,MIOL组70%的患者术后中、近距离无需佩戴眼镜。
CustomMatch模式可在近、中、远距离提供令人满意的视力,并在一定程度上提高生活质量。