Solving a mental rotation task in congenital hemiparesis: motor imagery versus visual imagery.

A recent study showed that motor imagery was compromised after right congenital hemiparesis. In that study, posture of the displayed stimuli and the actual posture of the hand making the response were incongruent. Ample evidence exists that such an incongruency may negatively influence laterality judgements in a mental rotation task. In the present study, three participant groups (controls, left hemiparesis, right hemiparesis [all n=11]) performed a mental rotation task in which posture of the displayed hand and the responding hand were congruent. A small amount of errors were made and linear relations between reaction times and rotation angles of the stimuli were found for all groups, suggesting intact motor imagery. However, reaction times for the participants with hemiparesis were consistently slower compared to controls and no asymmetry in responding between the affected and less-affected hand was found, suggesting a visual imagery strategy. Collectively, these results suggest that the ability to mentally rotate stimuli is still intact in right hemiparesis. The results are discussed in relation to two strategies that may have been used to solve the task: visual imagery and motor imagery.