Deasy B M, O'Sullivan-Coyne G, O'Donovan T R, McKenna S L, O'Sullivan G C
Leslie C. Quick Laboratory, Cork Cancer Research Centre, 5th Floor, BioSciences Institute, University College Cork and Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland.
Cancer Lett. 2007 Oct 28;256(2):246-58. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.06.013. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
The incidence of oesophageal cancer (OC) has risen in recent decades, with survival rates remaining poor despite surgical treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy. Studies have reported cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression in OC and current evidence suggests NSAIDs have major potential for chemoprevention through COX-2 inhibition. However, several reports have questioned the specificity of these inhibitors, suggesting they may act through mechanisms other than COX-2. We evaluated the effects of specific COX-2 inhibitors, NS-398 and nimesulide, on cell lines of both histological types of OC. COX-2 protein expression varied in the cell lines and corresponded with levels of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) production. Following treatment with low concentrations of NS-398 (0.1 microM), PGE(2) production was reduced dramatically, indicating inhibition of COX-2 activity. Examination of cellular morphology, caspase-3 activity and mitochondrial membrane integrity found no major induction of apoptotic cell death at concentrations below 100 microM. Tumour cell proliferation was significantly reduced at high concentrations (50-100 microM) of both inhibitors over 6 days. Cellular responses were more evident in NS-398-treated adenocarcinoma cells. However, concentrations required to inhibit proliferation were up to 1000-fold higher than those needed to inhibit enzyme activity. Addition of exogenous PGE(2) to NS-398-treated adenocarcinoma cells failed to reverse the inhibitory effects, indicating PG and COX-2 independence. It remains possible that in vivo COX-2 is the primary target, as enzyme inhibition can be achieved at low concentrations, however, inhibition of proliferation is not the primary mechanism of their anti-tumour activity.
近几十年来,食管癌(OC)的发病率有所上升,尽管进行了手术治疗和辅助化疗,但其生存率仍然很低。研究报告称,环氧化酶-2(COX-2)在OC中过度表达,目前的证据表明,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)通过抑制COX-2具有化学预防的主要潜力。然而,一些报告对这些抑制剂的特异性提出了质疑,表明它们可能通过COX-2以外的机制起作用。我们评估了特异性COX-2抑制剂NS-398和尼美舒利对两种组织学类型OC细胞系的影响。COX-2蛋白表达在细胞系中有所不同,并且与前列腺素E2(PGE2)的产生水平相对应。用低浓度的NS-398(0.1微摩尔)处理后,PGE2的产生显著减少,表明COX-2活性受到抑制。对细胞形态、半胱天冬酶-3活性和线粒体膜完整性的检查发现,在浓度低于100微摩尔时,未发现凋亡细胞死亡的主要诱导现象。在6天内,两种抑制剂的高浓度(50-100微摩尔)均显著降低了肿瘤细胞的增殖。在NS-398处理的腺癌细胞中,细胞反应更为明显。然而,抑制增殖所需的浓度比抑制酶活性所需的浓度高1000倍。向NS-398处理的腺癌细胞中添加外源性PGE2未能逆转抑制作用,表明PG和COX-2相互独立。体内COX-2仍有可能是主要靶点,因为低浓度即可实现酶抑制,然而,抑制增殖并非其抗肿瘤活性的主要机制。