Sun Da-Zhi, Xu Ling, Wei Pin-Kang, Liu Long, He Jin
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital to Second Military Medical University, 415 fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug 28;13(32):4321-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i32.4321.
To explore the syndrome differentiation in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and gene protein expression in gastric carcinoma.
Preoperative data of gastric cancer cases were collected from the General Surgery Department and classified according to the criteria for syndrome differentiation in TCM. E-cadherin (E-cad) and ICAM-1 gene protein expressions were detected in postoperative specimens from these cases by the immunohistochemical EnVision two-step method.
The E-cad positive expression rate was 90% in 100 cases of gastric carcinoma. The difference in E-cad expression was significant between the different syndrome differentiation types in TCM (P < 0.01). Further group-group comparison showed that there was a significant difference in E-cad expression between the stagnation of phlegm-damp type and the deficiency in both qi and blood and the deficiency-cold of stomach and spleen types, where E-cad expression was high. There was no significant difference between the internal obstruction of stagnant toxin type and the in-coordination between liver and stomach type, where E-cad expression was relatively low. The ICAM-1 positive expression rate was 58%, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (c2 = 8.999, P > 0.05).
E-cad expression is relatively low in the internal obstruction of stagnant toxin type and the in-coordination between liver and stomach type, where tumor development and metastasis may be associated with low E-cad expression, or with low homogeneous adhesiveness between tumor cells.
探讨胃癌的中医辨证及基因蛋白表达情况。
收集普通外科胃癌病例的术前资料,并按照中医辨证标准进行分类。采用免疫组织化学EnVision两步法检测这些病例术后标本中E-钙黏蛋白(E-cad)和细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1)基因蛋白的表达。
100例胃癌患者中E-cad阳性表达率为90%。中医不同辨证类型之间E-cad表达差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。进一步组间比较显示,痰湿阻滞型与气血两虚型、脾胃虚寒型之间E-cad表达差异有统计学意义,其中痰湿阻滞型E-cad表达较高。内毒蕴结型与肝胃不和型之间E-cad表达差异无统计学意义,其中E-cad表达相对较低。ICAM-1阳性表达率为58%,两组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=8.999,P>0.05)。
内毒蕴结型和肝胃不和型E-cad表达相对较低,肿瘤的发生发展及转移可能与E-cad低表达或肿瘤细胞间低同质性黏附有关。