Gietema Hester A, Schilham Arnold M, van Ginneken Bram, van Klaveren Rob J, Lammers Jan Willem J, Prokop Mathias
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Radiology. 2007 Sep;244(3):890-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443061330.
To retrospectively establish the minimum increase in emphysema score (ES) required for detection of real increased extent of emphysema with 95% confidence by using multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in a lung cancer screening setting.
The study was a substudy of the NELSON project that was approved by the Dutch Ministry of Health and the ethics committee of each participating hospital, with patient informed consent. For this substudy, original approval and informed consent allowed use of data for future research. Among 1684 men screened with low-dose multi-detector row CT (30 mAs, 16 detector rows, 0.75-mm section thickness) between April 2004 and March 2005, only participants who underwent repeat multi-detector row CT with the same scanner after 3 months because of an indeterminate pulmonary nodule were included. Extent of emphysema was considered to remain stable in this short period. Extent of low-attenuation areas representing emphysema was computed for repeat and baseline scans as percentage of lung volume below three attenuation threshold values (-910 HU, -930 HU, -950 HU). Limits of agreement were determined with Bland-Altman approach; upper limits were used to deduce the minimum increase in ES required for detecting increased extent of emphysema with 95% probability. Factors influencing the limits of agreement were determined.
In total, 157 men (mean age, 60 years) were included in the study. Limits of agreement for differences in total lung volume between repeat and baseline scans were -13.4% to +12.6% at -910 HU, -4.7% to +4.2% at -930 HU, and -1.3% to +1.1% at -950 HU. Differences in ES showed weak to moderate correlation with variation in level of inspiration (r=0.20-0.49, P<.05). Scanner calibration could be excluded as a factor contributing to variation in ES.
Increase in ES required to detect increased extent of smoking-related emphysema with 95% probability varies between 1.1% of total lung volume at -950 HU and 12.6% at -910 HU for low-dose multi-detector row CT. Clinical trial registration no. ISRCTN63545820.
通过在肺癌筛查中使用多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT),回顾性确定肺气肿评分(ES)的最小增加量,以95%的置信度检测肺气肿实际增加的范围。
本研究是NELSON项目的子研究,该项目经荷兰卫生部和各参与医院的伦理委员会批准,并获得患者知情同意。对于本项子研究,最初的批准和知情同意允许将数据用于未来的研究。在2004年4月至2005年3月期间,对1684名男性进行了低剂量多排螺旋CT(30 mAs,16排探测器,0.75毫米层厚)筛查,仅纳入因肺结节不明确而在3个月后使用同一台扫描仪进行重复多排螺旋CT检查的参与者。在这一短时间内,肺气肿的范围被认为保持稳定。计算代表肺气肿的低衰减区域在重复扫描和基线扫描中的范围,以低于三个衰减阈值(-910 HU、-930 HU、-950 HU)的肺体积百分比表示。采用Bland-Altman方法确定一致性界限;上限用于推断以95%概率检测到肺气肿范围增加所需的ES最小增加量。确定影响一致性界限的因素。
本研究共纳入157名男性(平均年龄60岁)。重复扫描和基线扫描之间总肺体积差异的一致性界限在-910 HU时为-13.4%至+12.6%,在-930 HU时为-4.7%至+4.2%,在-950 HU时为-1.3%至+1.1%。ES差异与吸气水平变化呈弱至中度相关(r = 0.20 - 0.49,P <.05)。可以排除扫描仪校准作为导致ES变化的一个因素。
对于低剂量多排螺旋CT,以95%概率检测与吸烟相关的肺气肿范围增加所需的ES增加量在-950 HU时为总肺体积的1.1%至-910 HU时的12.6%之间。临床试验注册号:ISRCTN63545820。