San José Estépar Raúl, Barr R Graham, Fain Sean B, Grenier Philippe A, Hoffman Eric A, Humphries Stephen M, Kirby Miranda, Obuchowski Nancy, Ryerson Christopher J, Seo Joon Beom, Tal-Singer Ruth, Ash Samuel Y, Bankier Alexander A, Crapo James, Han MeiLan, Kellermeyer Liz, Goldin Jonathan, McCollough Cynthia H, Newell John D, Miller Bruce E, Nordenmark Lars H, Remy-Jardin Martine, Prokop Mathias, Ohno Yoshiharu, Silverman Edwin K, Strange Charlie, Washko George R, Lynch David A
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Radiology, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States;
Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 24;211(5):709-28. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202410-2012SO.
Emphysema's significant morbidity and mortality underscore the need for reliable outcome metrics in clinical trials. However, commonly accepted COPD outcome measures do not adequately capture emphysema severity or progression. Computed tomography (CT) metrics have been validated as accurate indicators of pathological emphysema and predictors of COPD progression, exacerbations, and mortality. This Position Paper reviews the evidence supporting CT densitometry as a biomarker for emphysema, establishes implementation standards, and highlights areas for future research. A systematic literature review addressed three key questions: whether CT densitometry can be used as a diagnostic biomarker of emphysema, whether CT densitometry can be used as prognostic biomarker, and whether longitudinal change in densitometry can be used as a disease progression monitoring biomarker. Emphysema metrics, such as the percentage of low attenuation areas (LAA), are validated, highly reproducible diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Volume-adjusted lung density is recommended for disease monitoring. Both metrics demonstrate a scan-rescan intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.99 with proper technique. The paper also discusses relevant CT physics, techniques, and sources of variation, including technical factors, physiological changes, and software analysis. Key recommendations for clinical trials include using standardized CT techniques, proper subject selection, and longitudinal evaluation with volume-adjusted lung density.
肺气肿的高发病率和死亡率凸显了在临床试验中需要可靠的疗效指标。然而,目前普遍接受的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)疗效指标并不能充分反映肺气肿的严重程度或进展情况。计算机断层扫描(CT)指标已被证实是病理性肺气肿的准确指标,以及COPD进展、急性加重和死亡率的预测指标。本立场文件回顾了支持CT密度测定作为肺气肿生物标志物的证据,确立了实施标准,并突出了未来研究的领域。一项系统的文献综述探讨了三个关键问题:CT密度测定是否可作为肺气肿的诊断生物标志物,CT密度测定是否可作为预后生物标志物,以及密度测定的纵向变化是否可作为疾病进展监测生物标志物。肺气肿指标,如低衰减区域(LAA)百分比,是经过验证的、高度可重复的诊断和预后生物标志物。建议使用体积校正肺密度进行疾病监测。在采用适当技术的情况下,这两个指标的扫描-再扫描组内相关系数均为0.99。本文还讨论了相关的CT物理学、技术以及变异来源,包括技术因素、生理变化和软件分析。对临床试验的关键建议包括使用标准化的CT技术、适当的受试者选择以及采用体积校正肺密度进行纵向评估。