Agel Julie, Dick Randall, Nelson Bradley, Marshall Stephen W, Dompier Thomas P
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
J Athl Train. 2007 Apr-Jun;42(2):249-54.
To review 4 years of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) injury surveillance data for women's ice hockey and to identify potential areas for injury prevention initiatives.
The NCAA ISS prospectively collects data on injuries sustained during collegiate participation. Women's NCAA ice hockey began participation in the ISS during the 2000-2001 season. On average, over the 4 years, 15.6% of the eligible schools elected to send their injury data.
Over the 4 years of study, the rate of injury in games was more than 5 times higher than the injury rate in practices (12.6 versus 2.5 injuries per 1000 athlete-exposures, rate ratio = 5.0, 95% confidence interval = 4.2, 6.1, P < .01). Preseason practice injury rates were almost twice as high as in-season practice rates (4.2 versus 2.3 injuries per 1000 athlete-exposures, rate ratio = 1.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.7, 2.0, P < .01). Concussions were the most common injury in both games (21.6%) and practices (13.2%). The rate of concussions in games appeared to be trending upward over the study period. The greatest number of game injuries (approximately 50%) resulted from player contact, whereas practice injuries were from either contact with another object or noncontact mechanisms.
Women's ice hockey is an evolving NCAA sport. Only 4 years of ISS data are available and, therefore, data should be interpreted with caution. Women's ice hockey does not allow for formal body checking; however, approximately 50% of all game injuries were reported to result from contact with another player. Future researchers need to evaluate the effectiveness of the no-checking rule. Additional years of data collection will be required to allow the data to become more stable, and to increase attention to mechanism-of-injury issues. We anticipate that the hypothesized inconsistencies in skill level across and within the various women's teams also will be reduced as more consistently skilled players develop, allowing for more stability in the injury scenario.
回顾美国大学体育协会(NCAA)4年的女子冰球伤病监测数据,确定预防伤病措施的潜在领域。
NCAA伤病监测系统前瞻性收集大学生参赛期间的伤病数据。NCAA女子冰球于2000 - 2001赛季开始参与该监测系统。在这4年中,平均有15.6%符合条件的学校选择提交其伤病数据。
在4年的研究期间,比赛中的伤病发生率比训练中的伤病发生率高出5倍多(每1000运动员暴露次数中分别为12.6次和2.5次伤病,率比 = 5.0,95%置信区间 = 4.2, 6.1,P < 0.01)。季前训练伤病发生率几乎是赛季中训练发生率的两倍(每1000运动员暴露次数中分别为4.2次和2.3次伤病,率比 = 1.8,95%置信区间 = 1.7, 2.0,P < 0.01)。脑震荡是比赛(21.6%)和训练(13.2%)中最常见的伤病。在研究期间,比赛中的脑震荡发生率似乎呈上升趋势。比赛中最大数量的伤病(约50%)是由球员接触导致的,而训练伤病则是由与其他物体接触或非接触机制引起的。
女子冰球是一项不断发展的NCAA运动项目。目前仅有4年的伤病监测系统数据,因此数据解读应谨慎。女子冰球不允许正式的身体冲撞检查;然而,据报道,所有比赛伤病中约50%是由与其他球员接触导致的。未来的研究人员需要评估禁止身体冲撞检查规则的有效性。需要更多年份的数据收集以使数据更加稳定,并增加对伤病机制问题的关注。我们预计,随着更多技术水平一致的球员的发展,各女子球队之间以及球队内部技能水平假设的不一致性也将降低,从而使伤病情况更加稳定。