全科医生使用基于互联网的患者资料进行性伴侣通知。

General practitioners' use of internet-based patient materials for partner notification.

作者信息

Tomnay Jane E, Pitts Marian K, Fairley Christopher K

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Univeristy of Melbourne, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Aug;34(8):613-6.

PMID:17710752

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if general practitioners (GPs) would use chlamydia resources for partner notification (PN) when the address to a website was printed on positive results.

STUDY DESIGN

Two surveys (pre-/postintervention) were sent to GPs before half were exposed to the website address on positive chlamydia results.

RESULTS

Of 499 eligible GPs, 233 (48%) returned completed preintervention surveys and 173 of 233 GPs (78%) returned postintervention surveys. Partner letters increased from 13% (10/78) to 36% (28/78) (P = 0.0009) and brochures from 33% (26/78) to 54% (42/78) (P = 0.003) among those exposed to the website. There was no significant change among GPs not exposed to the website. GPs who reported practicing PN all of the time did not change but was greater than 93% in all groups.

CONCLUSION

When a website was provided with useful documents on it, GPs were more likely to provide resources for clients to pass onto partners.

摘要

目的

确定当衣原体检测呈阳性的结果上印有网站地址时，全科医生（GPs）是否会使用衣原体相关资源进行性伴侣通知（PN）。

研究设计

在一半的全科医生接触到衣原体检测阳性结果上的网站地址之前和之后，分别向他们发送了两项调查（干预前/干预后）。

结果

在499名符合条件的全科医生中，233名（48%）返回了完整的干预前调查问卷，233名全科医生中的173名（78%）返回了干预后调查问卷。在接触该网站的人群中，性伴侣告知信的比例从13%（10/78）增至36%（28/78）（P = 0.0009），宣传册的比例从33%（26/78）增至54%（42/78）（P = 0.003）。未接触该网站的全科医生中无显著变化。报告一直进行性伴侣通知的全科医生没有变化，但所有组中这一比例均超过93%。