• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医疗资源分配能否做到公平?关于医疗保健系统中正义的伦理考量]

[Can rationing be fair? Ethical considerations regarding justice in the healthcare system].

作者信息

Rosenberger Michael

机构信息

Institut für Moraltheologie, Linz, Osterreich.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(5):356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.04.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.04.013
PMID:17711264
Abstract

While economy tries to solve the problem of scarcity by rationing, i.e. increasing efficiency, ethics reflect the path of the just distribution of scarce goods, necessarily including the means of transparent and fair rationing. But how can such rationing be realised in a healthcare system? Non-medical criteria such as the patient's social function or age, though vividly discussed, are inappropriate. Only medical criteria can bring sustainable solutions. The QALY and DALY models are such an attempt. Careful reflection of these measures of quality of life and, in some aspects, accompanying rules to avoid extreme unfairness will be critical to their success.

摘要

虽然经济学试图通过配给来解决稀缺问题,即提高效率,但伦理学反映了稀缺物品公正分配的途径,这必然包括透明和公平配给的手段。但在医疗系统中如何实现这种配给呢?诸如患者的社会功能或年龄等非医学标准,尽管讨论热烈,但并不合适。只有医学标准才能带来可持续的解决方案。质量调整生命年(QALY)和伤残调整生命年(DALY)模型就是这样一种尝试。对这些生活质量衡量标准进行仔细思考,并在某些方面制定配套规则以避免极端不公平,将对它们的成功至关重要。

相似文献

1
[Can rationing be fair? Ethical considerations regarding justice in the healthcare system].[医疗资源分配能否做到公平?关于医疗保健系统中正义的伦理考量]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(5):356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.04.013.
2
[Rationalization, rationing, prioritization: terminology and ethical approaches to the allocation of limited resources in hematology/oncology].[合理化、配给、优先排序:血液学/肿瘤学中有限资源分配的术语和伦理方法]
Onkologie. 2011;34 Suppl 1:2-5. doi: 10.1159/000323063. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
3
The ethics and reality of rationing in medicine.医学资源分配的伦理与现实
Chest. 2011 Dec;140(6):1625-1632. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0622.
4
Ethical considerations in the de-adoption of ineffective or harmful aspects of healthcare.医疗保健中摒弃无效或有害方面的伦理考量。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2016 Sep;29(5):214-7. doi: 10.1177/0840470416646632. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
5
Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don't like it and why maybe we should.将个人健康责任作为一种配给标准:我们为何不喜欢它以及或许我们应该喜欢它的原因。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Dec;34(12):871-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.024059.
6
Classical distributive justice and the European healthcare system: rethinking the foundations of European health care in an age of crises.古典分配正义与欧洲医疗体系:在危机时代重新思考欧洲医疗保健的基础。
J Med Philos. 2015 Apr;40(2):190-200. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhu078. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
7
[Ethical basis of priority setting in healthcare].[医疗保健中确定优先次序的伦理基础]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):867-73. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1116-x.
8
[Images of man and distributive justice in health care. Ethical considerations in theological perspective].[医疗保健中的人类形象与分配正义。神学视角下的伦理考量]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2003 Jan 31;128(5):210-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-36984.
9
Justice, health, and healthcare.正义、健康与医疗保健。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Spring;1(2):2-16. doi: 10.1162/152651601300168834.
10
Reflective disequilibrium: a critical evaluation of the complete lives framework for healthcare rationing.反思性失衡:对医疗资源分配的完整生命框架的批判性评估。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb;47(2):108-112. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106626. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Fair Healthcare Practices in Orthopedics Assessed with a New Framework.用新框架评估骨科领域的公平医疗实践。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;11(20):2753. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202753.