Sinha Sanjay K, Abrams Jonathan H, Weller Robert S
Department of Anesthesiology, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2007 Sep;105(3):848-52. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000271912.84440.01.
We quantified the motor response after ultrasound (U-S)-guided needle placement for interscalene block (ISB). We then compared block characteristics based on motor response above or below 0.5 mA.
Sixty-one patients scheduled for ambulatory shoulder surgery under ISB and general anesthesia were included in this prospective, observational study. Preoperatively, an insulated needle was positioned by U-S in the interscalene groove. The lowest current producing motor response was determined, and 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine was injected. Motor and sensory block were tested in the upper trunk distribution for 15 min until general anesthesia was induced. Postoperatively, the success of upper trunk block, pain score in the postanesthesia care unit and block duration, and analgesic tablet consumption overnight were recorded. Patients were divided a priori into Group A (current < or =0.5 mA) and Group B (current >0.5 mA), and results were compared between groups.
The observed current range was 0.14-1.7 mA, with current < or =0.5 mA in 42% of patients (Group A). All patients had complete sensorimotor upper trunk block and none required narcotics in the postanesthesia care unit. Block duration (both groups: 17.8 +/- 4.9 h, mean +/- sd) and home analgesic use were equivalent. Sensory block onset was equivalent between groups, but incomplete motor block at 15 min was more likely in Group B: 37% vs 12% in Group A (P = 0.03).
During U-S-guided ISB using nerve stimulation, the observed motor response below or above 0.5 mA had no impact on success or duration of upper trunk block.
我们对超声(U-S)引导下斜角肌间隙阻滞(ISB)时的运动反应进行了量化。然后,我们根据0.5毫安以上或以下的运动反应比较了阻滞特征。
本前瞻性观察性研究纳入了61例计划在ISB和全身麻醉下行门诊肩部手术的患者。术前,通过超声将绝缘针置于斜角肌间隙。确定产生运动反应的最低电流,并注射30毫升含肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因。在上干分布区测试运动和感觉阻滞15分钟,直到诱导全身麻醉。术后,记录上干阻滞的成功率、麻醉后护理单元的疼痛评分、阻滞持续时间以及过夜镇痛药的消耗量。患者被预先分为A组(电流≤0.5毫安)和B组(电流>0.5毫安),并比较两组结果。
观察到的电流范围为0.14-1.7毫安,42%的患者电流≤0.5毫安(A组)。所有患者均有完全的上干感觉运动阻滞,且在麻醉后护理单元均无需使用麻醉剂。阻滞持续时间(两组均为:17.8±4.9小时,平均值±标准差)和家庭镇痛药物使用情况相当。两组间感觉阻滞起效时间相当,但B组在15分钟时运动阻滞不完全的可能性更高:A组为12%,B组为37%(P=0.03)。
在使用神经刺激的超声引导下ISB过程中,观察到的0.5毫安以下或以上的运动反应对上干阻滞的成功率或持续时间没有影响。