Suppr超能文献

超声与神经刺激作为肌间沟导管置入针终点的前瞻性随机对照研究。

A prospective randomized comparison of ultrasound and neurostimulation as needle end points for interscalene catheter placement.

作者信息

Fredrickson Michael J, Ball Craig M, Dalgleish Adam J, Stewart Alistair W, Short Tim G

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1695-700. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819c29b8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this prospective, randomized study, we tested the hypothesis that interscalene catheters placed for shoulder surgery using an ultrasound needle end point provide postoperative analgesia similar in quality to those placed using a neurostimulation needle end point. Secondary end points included needle time under the skin, procedure-related pain, and the incidence of early neurological complications.

METHODS

Patients presenting for shoulder surgery were recruited. Needles introduced for catheter insertion were initially guided with out-of-plane ultrasound imaging but were prospectively randomized to either sonographic placement immediately lateral to the interscalene interface (n = 41) or to an appropriate motor response at <0.5 mA (n = 40). Catheters were then advanced blindly 2-3 cm beyond needle tip. All surgery was conducted under general anesthesia. At the end of surgery, an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 2 mL/h with as-required hourly 5 mL boluses was instituted and continued at home for 2-5 days. Needle time under the skin and numerical rating pain score (NRPS) during insertion were recorded. Patients recorded worst NRPS, the need for supplementary ropivacaine boluses and tramadol on postoperative days 1 and 2. All patients were questioned at Day 10 for new neurological symptoms.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the worst NRPS at rest and on movement and the requirement for supplementary ropivacaine boluses or tramadol during the first 48 postoperative hours. In one patient in group ultrasound, a satisfactory ultrasound image was unobtainable. An appropriate motor response was obtained in all subjects in group neurostimulation. The median (quartiles) needle time under the skin was 78 (65-101) s in group ultrasound and 108 (94-129) s in group neurostimulation (P < 0.001). The median (quartiles) insertion NRPS was 2 (0-4) in group ultrasound and 3 (1-5) in group neurostimulation (P < 0.048). There was no difference in the frequency of neurological complications between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Interscalene catheters placed for shoulder surgery using an ultrasound needle end point provide postoperative analgesia that is of similar quality to that obtained when using a neurostimulation needle end point. The ultrasound end point was associated with a reduction in needle under the skin time and procedure-related pain.

摘要

背景

在这项前瞻性随机研究中,我们检验了以下假设:在肩部手术中使用超声引导针终点放置的肌间沟导管提供的术后镇痛质量与使用神经刺激引导针终点放置的导管相似。次要终点包括皮下进针时间、与操作相关的疼痛以及早期神经并发症的发生率。

方法

招募拟行肩部手术的患者。用于导管插入的穿刺针最初采用平面外超声成像引导,但前瞻性随机分为在肌间沟界面外侧立即进行超声引导放置组(n = 41)或在<0.5 mA时获得适当运动反应组(n = 40)。然后将导管在穿刺针尖端以外盲目推进2 - 3 cm。所有手术均在全身麻醉下进行。手术结束时,开始输注0.2%罗哌卡因2 mL/h,并根据需要每小时追加5 mL推注剂量,持续至术后2 - 5天在家中使用。记录皮下进针时间和穿刺过程中的数字疼痛评分(NRPS)。患者记录术后第1天和第2天的最严重NRPS、追加罗哌卡因推注剂量的需求以及曲马多的使用情况。所有患者在第10天接受有关新出现神经症状的询问。

结果

术后48小时内,静息和活动时的最严重NRPS以及追加罗哌卡因推注剂量或曲马多的需求无显著差异。在超声引导组的1例患者中,无法获得满意的超声图像。神经刺激组的所有受试者均获得了适当的运动反应。超声引导组皮下进针时间的中位数(四分位数间距)为78(65 - 101)秒,神经刺激组为108(94 - 129)秒(P < 0.001)。超声引导组穿刺时NRPS的中位数(四分位数间距)为2(0 - 4),神经刺激组为3(1 - 5)(P < 0.048)。两组神经并发症的发生率无差异。

结论

在肩部手术中使用超声引导针终点放置的肌间沟导管提供的术后镇痛质量与使用神经刺激引导针终点放置的导管相似。超声引导终点与皮下进针时间和与操作相关的疼痛减少有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验