Borbulevych Oleg Y, Insaidoo Francis K, Baxter Tiffany K, Powell Daniel J, Johnson Laura A, Restifo Nicholas P, Baker Brian M
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 251 Nieuwland Science Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
J Mol Biol. 2007 Oct 5;372(5):1123-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.025. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
Small structural changes in peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules often result in large changes in immunogenicity, supporting the notion that T cell receptors are exquisitely sensitive to antigen structure. Yet there are striking examples of TCR recognition of structurally dissimilar ligands. The resulting unpredictability of how T cells will respond to different or modified antigens impacts both our understanding of the physical bases for TCR specificity as well as efforts to engineer peptides for immunomodulation. In cancer immunotherapy, epitopes and variants derived from the MART-1/Melan-A protein are widely used as clinical vaccines. Two overlapping epitopes spanning amino acid residues 26 through 35 are of particular interest: numerous clinical studies have been performed using variants of the MART-1 26-35 decamer, although only the 27-35 nonamer has been found on the surface of targeted melanoma cells. Here, we show that the 26-35 and 27-35 peptides adopt strikingly different conformations when bound to HLA-A2. Nevertheless, clonally distinct MART-1(26/27-35)-reactive T cells show broad cross-reactivity towards these ligands. Simultaneously, however, many of the cross-reactive T cells remain unable to recognize anchor-modified variants with very subtle structural differences. These dichotomous observations challenge our thinking about how structural information on unligated peptide/MHC complexes should be best used when addressing questions of TCR specificity. Our findings also indicate that caution is warranted in the design of immunotherapeutics based on the MART-1 26/27-35 epitopes, as neither cross-reactivity nor selectivity is predictable based on the analysis of the structures alone.
主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)分子呈递的肽段中,微小的结构变化往往会导致免疫原性发生巨大改变,这支持了T细胞受体对抗原结构极其敏感的观点。然而,也有一些显著的例子表明TCR能够识别结构不同的配体。T细胞对不同或修饰抗原的反应具有不可预测性,这既影响了我们对TCR特异性物理基础的理解,也影响了为免疫调节而设计肽段的努力。在癌症免疫治疗中,源自MART-1/Melan-A蛋白的表位和变体被广泛用作临床疫苗。两个跨越氨基酸残基26至35的重叠表位尤其令人关注:尽管在靶向黑色素瘤细胞表面仅发现了MART-1 26 - 35十聚体的27 - 35九聚体变体,但已经使用该变体进行了大量临床研究。在这里,我们表明,26 - 35和27 - 35肽段与HLA - A2结合时会呈现出截然不同的构象。然而,克隆上不同的MART-1(26/27 - 35)反应性T细胞对这些配体表现出广泛的交叉反应性。然而,与此同时,许多交叉反应性T细胞仍然无法识别结构差异非常细微的锚定修饰变体。这些矛盾的观察结果挑战了我们对于在解决TCR特异性问题时,应如何最佳利用未结合肽/MHC复合物的结构信息的思考。我们的研究结果还表明,在基于MART-1 26/27 - 35表位设计免疫治疗药物时应谨慎,因为仅根据结构分析,交叉反应性和选择性都是不可预测的。