Suppr超能文献

聚合材料防护手套。实验性渗透测试及副作用临床研究。

Protective gloves of polymeric materials. Experimental permeation testing and clinical study of side effects.

作者信息

Mellström G

机构信息

Division of Occupational Dermatology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Solna, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1991;163:1-54.

PMID:1771997
Abstract

In the occupational use and handling of hazardous chemicals and infectious materials, exposure must be minimized. To diminish the risk of direct skin contact and percutaneous toxicity, the use of protective gloves is one of the most important measures to consider. For effective protection, the selection process must include evaluation of permeation test data as well as the risk of side effects possibly caused by the glove materials. In permeation testing (in vitro), breakthrough time and permeation rate are key values measured. Test conditions such as size and design of the permeation test cell, flow rate of the collecting medium through the test cell, measurement systems, testing procedures and analytical equipment can vary and can have crucial influence on the test results. In the present investigation, five permeation test cells of different sizes and design were used, the collecting gas flow rate was varied between 60 and 120 ml/min and 120 to 500 ml/min, the ASTM F 739 and ISO/DIS standard test procedures were performed using two different measurement systems, and in vitro versus in vivo testing techniques were studied. Gloves and glove materials of neoprene were exposed to four organic solvents. The breakthrough times (in vitro) for the test chemicals were slightly influenced by variations in cell size and design, flow rate and test procedure. The only significant influence on the breakthrough time values was between the two measurement systems, direct flow and automatic sampling. On the other hand, the permeation rate values were affected to a much greater extent, in most cases significantly. The test conditions in the in vitro and in vivo procedures differed in many ways and the test results were therefore compared on a relative basis. The breakthrough time values for the solvents through gloves of vinyl, natural rubber and butyl rubber were in the same rank order in both in vitro and in vivo testing. There was no evident correlation between the relative permeation rate values (in vitro) and the relative absorption rate values (in vivo). Disposable gloves of latex or plastic materials are also commonly used in health care as protection against microorganisms. Therefore contact with disinfectants is frequent. The resistance of gloves made of natural rubber latex, vinyl (PVC) and polyethylene to permeation by ethanol, isopropanol, m-chlorocresol and glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant was studied mainly according to the ISO/DIS permeation test procedure. In addition, glove pieces exposed to isopropanol and ethanol were studied with the scanning electron microscope (SEM).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

在职业使用和处理危险化学品及传染性材料时,必须尽量减少接触。为降低直接皮肤接触和经皮毒性的风险,使用防护手套是最重要的考虑措施之一。为实现有效防护,选择过程必须包括对渗透测试数据的评估以及手套材料可能引起的副作用风险评估。在渗透测试(体外)中,穿透时间和渗透速率是测量的关键值。渗透测试池的尺寸和设计、收集介质通过测试池的流速、测量系统、测试程序和分析设备等测试条件可能各不相同,且会对测试结果产生关键影响。在本研究中,使用了五种不同尺寸和设计的渗透测试池,收集气体流速在60至120毫升/分钟和120至500毫升/分钟之间变化,采用两种不同的测量系统执行ASTM F 739和ISO/DIS标准测试程序,并研究了体外与体内测试技术。氯丁橡胶手套和手套材料暴露于四种有机溶剂中。测试化学品的穿透时间(体外)受测试池尺寸和设计、流速及测试程序变化的影响较小。对穿透时间值唯一显著的影响存在于两种测量系统之间,即直流和自动采样。另一方面,渗透速率值受到的影响要大得多,在大多数情况下具有显著影响。体外和体内程序中的测试条件在许多方面存在差异,因此测试结果在相对基础上进行比较。在体外和体内测试中,溶剂透过乙烯基、天然橡胶和丁基橡胶手套的穿透时间值排序相同。相对渗透速率值(体外)与相对吸收率值(体内)之间没有明显的相关性。乳胶或塑料材料的一次性手套在医疗保健中也常用于防护微生物。因此,与消毒剂的接触很频繁。主要根据ISO/DIS渗透测试程序研究了天然橡胶乳胶、乙烯基(PVC)和聚乙烯制成的手套对乙醇、异丙醇、间氯甲酚和戊二醛基消毒剂的抗渗透性能。此外,用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究了暴露于异丙醇和乙醇的手套片。(摘要截断于400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验