Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜检查与剖腹手术在腹部创伤处理中的比较

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in management of abdominal trauma.

作者信息

Cherkasov Mechail, Sitnikov Viktor, Sarkisyan B, Degtirev Oleg, Turbin Michail, Yakuba Abdulkadir

机构信息

Surgery Number 4, Rostov State Medical University, Rostov On Don, Russia.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):228-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9550-z. Epub 2007 Aug 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A majority of abdominal injuries (AIs) are associated with shock, hence most of the patients are hemodynamically unstable, which limits the use of video-assisted laparoscopy (VAL) in their management. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the possibility of using VAL in management of stable and unstable patients with abdominal trauma.

METHODS

In a period of six years 2,695 patients with AIs were evaluated. The subjects were evaluated retrospectively and divided into two groups. Group 1, consisting of 1,363 patients, had conventional routine investigations following which they underwent laparotomy for confirmatory diagnosis and definitive management. The second group, consisting of 1,332 patients, underwent diagnostic laparoscopy in addition to the conventional investigations in the first group; 411 patients of this group had therapeutic laparoscopy. Demographic information, incidence of organs injuries and operative findings, success rate of VAL and laparotomy repair, complications, associated injuries, and hospital mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

The age of 62.6% of our patients was 20-50 years, while 10.6% and 14.5% were less than 19 and greater than 50 years, respectively. Associated injuries were head, chest, musculoskeletal, and vertebral column. Most of the victims presented with shock; 50.7%, 24.7%, and 15.9% of the patients were in mild, moderate, and severe shock respectively, and 8.7% of the subjects had stable hemodynamic status. In the first group 47.1% of the laparotomies were absolutely indicated and 24.4% were negative. Of the patients who had laparotomy, 26.0% would have been managed confidently by VAL. In the second group following VAL 42.5% of the patients did not require surgical intervention. VAL surgery was performed in 30.8% of patients. Conversion to laparotomy was performed in 26.7% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The VAL technique can be confidently used as a main tool to expedite evaluation and treatment of patients with abdominal trauma in cases of both stable and unstable hemodynamic status.

摘要

背景

大多数腹部损伤(AI)与休克相关,因此大多数患者血流动力学不稳定,这限制了视频辅助腹腔镜检查(VAL)在其治疗中的应用。本研究的目的是证明在腹部创伤稳定和不稳定患者的治疗中使用VAL的可能性。

方法

在六年期间,对2695例AI患者进行了评估。对受试者进行回顾性评估并分为两组。第一组由1363例患者组成,进行常规常规检查,随后接受剖腹手术以进行确诊和确定性治疗。第二组由1332例患者组成,除了第一组的常规检查外,还接受了诊断性腹腔镜检查;该组411例患者接受了治疗性腹腔镜检查。评估了人口统计学信息、器官损伤发生率和手术结果、VAL和剖腹手术修复的成功率、并发症、相关损伤和医院死亡率。

结果

我们62.6%的患者年龄在20至50岁之间,而分别有10.6%和14.5%的患者年龄小于19岁和大于50岁。相关损伤包括头部、胸部、肌肉骨骼和脊柱。大多数受害者出现休克;分别有50.7%、24.7%和15.9%的患者处于轻度、中度和重度休克,8.7%的受试者血流动力学稳定。在第一组中,47.1%的剖腹手术是绝对必要的,24.4%为阴性。在接受剖腹手术的患者中,26.0%的患者可通过VAL得到可靠治疗。在第二组中,VAL后42.5%的患者不需要手术干预。30.8%的患者进行了VAL手术。26.7%的患者转为剖腹手术。

结论

VAL技术可作为在血流动力学稳定和不稳定情况下加速评估和治疗腹部创伤患者的主要工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验