• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证西部创伤协会管理腹部前侧刺伤患者的算法:一项西部创伤协会多中心试验

Validating the Western Trauma Association algorithm for managing patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a Western Trauma Association multicenter trial.

作者信息

Biffl Walter L, Kaups Krista L, Pham Tam N, Rowell Susan E, Jurkovich Gregory J, Burlew Clay Cothren, Elterman J, Moore Ernest E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center/University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado 80204-4507, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1494-502. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823ba1de.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31823ba1de
PMID:22182859
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The optimal management of stable patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASWs) remains a matter of debate. A recent Western Trauma Association (WTA) multicenter trial found that exclusion of peritoneal penetration by local wound exploration (LWE) allowed immediate discharge (D/C) of 41% of patients with AASWs. Performance of computed tomography (CT) scanning or diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) did not improve the D/C rate; however, these tests led to nontherapeutic (NONTHER) laparotomy (LAP) in 24% and 31% of cases, respectively. An algorithm was proposed that included LWE, followed by either D/C or admission for serial clinical assessments, without further imaging or invasive testing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the algorithm in providing timely interventions for significant injuries.

METHODS

A multicenter, institutional review board-approved study enrolled patients with AASWs. Management was guided by the WTA AASW algorithm. Data on the presentation, evaluation, and clinical course were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-two patients (94% men, age, 34.7 years ± 0.3 years) were enrolled. Sixty-two (28%) had immediate LAP, of which 87% were therapeutic (THER). Three (1%) died and the mean length of stay (LOS) was 6.9 days. One hundred sixty patients were stable and asymptomatic, and 81 of them (51%) were managed entirely per protocol. Twenty (25%) were D/C'ed from the emergency department after (-) LWE, and 11 (14%) were taken to the operating room (OR) for LAP when their clinical condition changed. Two (2%) of the protocol group underwent NONTHER LAP, and no patient experienced morbidity or mortality related to delay in treatment. Seventy-nine (49%) patients had deviations from protocol. There were 47 CT scans, 11 DPLs, and 9 laparoscopic explorations performed. In addition to the laparoscopic procedures, 38 (48%) patients were taken to the OR based on test results rather than a change in the patient's clinical condition; 17 (45%) of these patients had a NONTHER LAP. Eighteen (23%) patients were D/C'ed from the emergency department. The LOS was no different among patients who had immediate or delayed LAP. Mean LOS after NONTHER LAP was 3.6 days ± 0.8 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The WTA proposed algorithm is designed for cost-effectiveness. Serial clinical assessments can be performed without the added expense of CT, DPL, or laparoscopy. Patients requiring LAP generally manifest early in their course, and there does not appear to be any morbidity related to a delay to OR. These data validate this approach and should be confirmed in a larger number of patients to more convincingly evaluate the algorithm's safety and cost-effectiveness compared with other approaches.

摘要

未加标注

对于稳定的腹部刺伤(AASW)患者,最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。西方创伤协会(WTA)最近的一项多中心试验发现,通过局部伤口探查(LWE)排除腹膜穿透可使41%的AASW患者立即出院(D/C)。计算机断层扫描(CT)或诊断性腹腔灌洗(DPL)并未提高出院率;然而,这些检查分别导致24%和31%的病例进行了非治疗性(NONTHER)剖腹手术(LAP)。提出了一种算法,包括LWE,然后是D/C或入院进行系列临床评估,无需进一步的影像学检查或侵入性检测。本研究的目的是评估该算法在为严重损伤提供及时干预方面的安全性和有效性。

方法

一项经机构审查委员会批准的多中心研究纳入了AASW患者。治疗遵循WTA的AASW算法。前瞻性记录患者的临床表现、评估和临床病程数据。

结果

共纳入222例患者(94%为男性,年龄34.7岁±0.3岁)。62例(28%)立即进行了LAP,其中87%为治疗性(THER)手术。3例(1%)死亡,平均住院时间(LOS)为6.9天。160例患者病情稳定且无症状,其中81例(51%)完全按照方案进行治疗。20例(25%)在LWE结果为阴性后从急诊科出院,11例(14%)在临床状况改变时被送往手术室(OR)进行LAP。方案组中有2例(2%)进行了NONTHER LAP,没有患者因治疗延迟而出现并发症或死亡。79例(49%)患者未按方案治疗。进行了47次CT扫描、11次DPL检查和9次腹腔镜探查。除了腹腔镜手术外,38例(48%)患者是根据检查结果而非患者临床状况的变化被送往OR的;其中17例(45%)患者进行了NONTHER LAP。18例(23%)患者从急诊科出院。立即或延迟进行LAP的患者之间LOS无差异。NONTHER LAP后的平均LOS为3.6天±0.8天。

结论

WTA提出的算法旨在实现成本效益。可以进行系列临床评估,而无需增加CT、DPL或腹腔镜检查的费用。需要进行LAP的患者通常在病程早期就会表现出来,似乎没有因延迟手术而导致的任何并发症。这些数据验证了这种方法,应在更多患者中得到证实,以更令人信服地评估该算法与其他方法相比的安全性和成本效益。

相似文献

1
Validating the Western Trauma Association algorithm for managing patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a Western Trauma Association multicenter trial.验证西部创伤协会管理腹部前侧刺伤患者的算法:一项西部创伤协会多中心试验
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1494-502. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823ba1de.
2
Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a Western Trauma Association multicenter trial.前腹部刺伤患者的管理:一项西部创伤协会多中心试验
J Trauma. 2009 May;66(5):1294-301. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819dc688.
3
Selective clinical management of anterior abdominal stab wounds.腹部前侧刺伤的选择性临床处理
Am J Surg. 2004 Dec;188(6):807-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.046.
4
Diagnostic laparoscopy after anterior abdominal stab wounds: worth another look?腹部前刺伤后行诊断性腹腔镜检查:值得再看一眼吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Dec;75(6):1013-7; discussion 1017-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a1fde8.
5
The utility of laparoscopic evaluation of the parietal peritoneum in the management of anterior abdominal stab wounds.腹腔镜评估壁层腹膜在腹部前侧刺伤处理中的应用
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
6
Nonoperative management of anterior thoracoabdominal stab wounds in selected patients.选择性患者的前胸腹刺伤的非手术治疗。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328349ed3b.
7
The contribution of laparoscopy in evaluation of penetrating abdominal wounds.腹腔镜检查在评估腹部穿透伤中的作用。
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Aug;201(2):213-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.04.021.
8
Diagnostic laparoscopy in abdominal stab wounds: a prospective, randomized study.腹部刺伤的诊断性腹腔镜检查:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Trauma. 2003 Oct;55(4):636-45. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000063000.05274.A4.
9
Hemodynamically "stable" patients with peritonitis after penetrating abdominal trauma: identifying those who are bleeding.穿透性腹部创伤后血流动力学“稳定”的腹膜炎患者:识别那些正在出血的患者。
Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;140(8):767-72. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.8.767.
10
Local wound exploration remains a valuable triage tool for the evaluation of anterior abdominal stab wounds.局部伤口探查仍然是评估腹部前侧刺伤的一种有价值的分诊工具。
Am J Surg. 2009 Aug;198(2):223-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.024. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Iliopsoas Hematoma and Abscess Formation as a Complication of an Anterior Abdominal Penetrating Injury: a Case Report and Review of Literature.髂腰肌血肿和脓肿形成作为前腹部穿透性损伤的并发症:病例报告和文献复习。
Med Arch. 2022 Aug;76(4):308-312. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2022.76.308-312.
2
Conservative management of abdominoperineal impalement trauma - A case report.腹会阴贯通伤的保守治疗——一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;76:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.060. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
3
Penetrating abdominal trauma in the era of selective conservatism: a prospective cohort study in a level 1 trauma center.
选择性保守治疗时代的穿透性腹部创伤:1 级创伤中心的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):881-889. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01478-y. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
4
Liver trauma: WSES 2020 guidelines.肝脏创伤:WSES 2020 指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Mar 30;15(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00302-7.
5
Obesity May Not be Protective in Abdominal Stab Wounds.肥胖可能对腹部刺伤无保护作用。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2019 Jul-Sep;12(3):168-172. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_41_18.
6
Frequency of intra-abdominal organ injury is higher in patients with concomitant stab wounds to other anatomical areas.在伴有其他解剖部位刺伤的患者中,腹腔内器官损伤的发生率更高。
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0167-4.
7
Characteristics and management of penetrating abdominal injuries in a German level I trauma center.德国一级创伤中心穿透性腹部损伤的特征与处理
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Apr;45(2):315-321. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0911-1. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
8
Self-inflicted injuries are an important cause of penetrating traumatic injuries in Japan.在日本,自残是穿透性创伤性损伤的一个重要原因。
Acute Med Surg. 2016 Mar 28;3(4):305-309. doi: 10.1002/ams2.186. eCollection 2016 Oct.
9
Trauma laparoscopy: when to start and when to convert?腹腔镜创伤手术:何时开始,何时中转开腹?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1344-1352. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5812-6. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
10
Self-Inflicted Abdominal Stab Wounds Have a Higher Rate of Non-therapeutic Laparotomy/Laparoscopy and a Lower Risk of Injury.自我造成的腹部刺伤非治疗性剖腹手术/腹腔镜检查率较高,受伤风险较低。
World J Surg. 2017 Nov;41(11):2681-2688. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4083-7.