Suppr超能文献

在治疗稳定型穿透性腹部创伤方面,腹腔镜手术的表现优于开腹手术:哥伦比亚一家创伤转诊医院的回顾性横断面研究。

Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross-sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia.

作者信息

Gómez Efrain J I, Vargas Luis F C, Lozada-Martinez Ivan D, Reyes Mariana, Pedraza Mauricio, Forero Nicolas, Guardo-Carmona Daniela, Narvaez-Rojas Alexis R

机构信息

Department of General Surgery Universidad El Bosque Bogota Colombia.

Department of Vascular Surgery and Angiology Hospital Militar Central Bogota Colombia.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2022 May 24;5(3):e640. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.640. eCollection 2022 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abdominal trauma is one of the leading causes of death. In Colombia, few studies have evaluated the results on related factors and outcomes when comparing laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma in a limited resources environment in a middle-income country.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in Bogota, Colombia from January 2018 to October 2020. Patients over 18 years old, hemodynamically stable with penetrating abdominal trauma without other body parts injuries, that underwent laparoscopy and/or laparotomy surgical exploration and treatment were included. Frequencies, percentages, correlations, and odds ratio were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were analyzed (26 laparoscopy vs. 26 laparotomy). Stabbing injuries were more frequent in both groups (76.9%), as well as involvement of the anterior abdomen. None missed enterotomies were reported in the laparoscopy group. Surgical time and bleeding were significantly lower in the laparoscopic approach group (63 vs. 115 min and 65 vs. 992 cc, respectively). The time to oral intake and length of stay in the intensive care unit was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic management group (2 vs. 3 days and 1 vs. 4 days, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical results found a safe scenario in a limited resources environment for the application of the laparoscopic technique to approach penetrating abdominal trauma in stable patients without missed injuries, low threshold of conversion to open approach, and additionally not presenting a higher percentage of complications compared with the laparotomy group in Colombia. Operative time, oral intake, and length of hospital stay were lower in the fully therapeutic laparoscopy group.

摘要

背景

腹部创伤是主要的死亡原因之一。在哥伦比亚,很少有研究评估在穿透性腹部创伤的治疗中,开腹手术与腹腔镜手术在相关因素和结果方面的对比。因此,本研究的目的是探讨在中等收入国家资源有限的环境下,腹腔镜手术治疗稳定型穿透性腹部创伤的可行性和安全性。

方法

2018年1月至2020年10月在哥伦比亚波哥大进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。纳入年龄超过18岁、血流动力学稳定、有穿透性腹部创伤且无其他身体部位损伤、接受腹腔镜和/或开腹手术探查及治疗的患者。计算了频率、百分比、相关性和比值比。

结果

共分析了52例患者(26例行腹腔镜手术,26例行开腹手术)。两组刺伤均更为常见(76.9%),且前腹部受累情况相似。腹腔镜手术组未报告漏诊的肠切开术。腹腔镜手术组的手术时间和出血量显著更低(分别为63分钟对115分钟和65毫升对992毫升)。腹腔镜治疗组的经口进食时间和重症监护病房住院时间显著更短(分别为2天对3天和1天对4天)。

结论

手术结果表明,在资源有限的环境下,对于稳定型患者应用腹腔镜技术治疗穿透性腹部创伤是安全的,无漏诊损伤,转为开放手术的阈值低,且与哥伦比亚的开腹手术组相比,并发症发生率没有更高。完全治疗性腹腔镜手术组的手术时间、经口进食时间和住院时间更低。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
2
Diagnostic laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma.穿透性腹部创伤的诊断性腹腔镜检查
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Apr;89(4):353-356. doi: 10.1111/ans.15140. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
Trauma laparoscopy: when to start and when to convert?腹腔镜创伤手术:何时开始,何时中转开腹?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1344-1352. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5812-6. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验