Kaufmann Andreas M, Nieland John D, Jochmus Ingrid, Baur Siegfried, Friese Klaus, Gabelsberger Joseph, Gieseking Friederike, Gissmann Lutz, Glasschröder Birgit, Grubert Thomas, Hillemanns Peter, Höpfl Reinhard, Ikenberg Hans, Schwarz Jörg, Karrasch Matthias, Knoll Anette, Küppers Volkmar, Lechmann Martin, Lelle Ralph J, Meissner Harald, Müller Rainer T, Pawlita Michael, Petry Karl Ulrich, Pilch Henryk, Walek Elke, Schneider Achim
Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Bachstrasse 18, 07740 Jena, Germany.
Int J Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;121(12):2794-800. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23022.
Persistent infection with human papillomaviruses (HPV) is a prerequisite for the development of cervical cancer. Vaccination with virus-like particles (VLP) has demonstrated efficacy in prophylaxis but lacks therapeutic potential. HPV16 L1E7 chimeric virus-like particles (CVLP) consist of a carboxy-terminally truncated HPV16L1 protein fused to the amino-terminal part of the HPV16 E7 protein and self-assemble by recombinant expression of the fusion protein. The CVLP are able to induce L1- and E7-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. We have performed a first clinical trial to gain information about the safety and to generate preliminary data on the therapeutic potential of the CVLP in humans. A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial has been conducted in 39 HPV16 mono-infected high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) patients (CIN 2/3). Two doses (75 mug or 250 mug) of CVLP were applied. The duration of the study was 24 weeks with 2 optional visits after another 12 and 24 weeks. The vaccine showed a very good safety profile with only minor adverse events attributable to the immunization. Antibodies with high titers against HPV16 L1 and low titers against HPV16 E7 as well as cellular immune responses against both proteins were induced. Responses were equivalent for both vaccine concentrations. A trend for histological improvement to CIN 1 or normal was seen in 39% of the patients receiving the vaccine and only 25% of the placebo recipients. Fifty-six percent of the responders were also HPV16 DNA-negative by the end of the study. Therefore, we demonstrated evidence for safety and a nonsignificant trend for the clinical efficacy of the HPV16 L1E7 CVLP vaccine.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)持续感染是宫颈癌发生的前提条件。用病毒样颗粒(VLP)进行疫苗接种已证明在预防方面有效,但缺乏治疗潜力。HPV16 L1E7嵌合病毒样颗粒(CVLP)由与HPV16 E7蛋白氨基末端部分融合的羧基末端截短的HPV16L1蛋白组成,并通过融合蛋白的重组表达进行自组装。CVLP能够诱导L1和E7特异性细胞毒性T淋巴细胞。我们进行了首次临床试验,以获取有关安全性的信息,并生成关于CVLP在人体治疗潜力的初步数据。在39例HPV16单感染的高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)患者(CIN 2/3)中进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验。应用了两剂(75微克或250微克)CVLP。研究持续时间为24周,在另外12周和24周后有2次可选访视。该疫苗显示出非常好的安全性,仅有轻微的免疫接种相关不良事件。诱导产生了针对HPV16 L1的高滴度抗体和针对HPV16 E7的低滴度抗体以及针对这两种蛋白的细胞免疫反应。两种疫苗浓度的反应相当。在接受疫苗的患者中,39%出现了向CIN 1或正常组织学改善的趋势,而安慰剂组仅为25%。到研究结束时,56%的反应者HPV16 DNA也呈阴性。因此,我们证明了HPV16 L1E7 CVLP疫苗的安全性证据以及临床疗效的非显著趋势。