• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奇数在何时不是奇数?任务规则对数字分类的MARC效应的影响。

When is an odd number not odd? Influence of task rule on the MARC effect for numeric classification.

作者信息

Cho Yang Seok, Proctor Robert W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):832-42. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.832.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.832
PMID:17723063
Abstract

When classifying numbers as odd or even with left-right keypresses, performance is better with the mapping even-right/odd-left than with the opposite mapping. This linguistic markedness association of response codes (MARC) effect has been attributed to compatibility between the linguistic markedness of stimulus and response codes. In 2 experiments participants made keypresses to the Arabic numerals or number words 3, 4, 8, and 9 using the odd-even parity rule or a multiple-of-3 rule, which yield the same keypress response for each stimulus. For both stimulus modes, the MARC effect was obtained with the odd-even rule, but tended to reverse with the multiple-of-3 rule. The reversal was complete for the right response, but task rule had little influence on the left response. The results are consistent with the view that the MARC effect and its reversal are caused by correspondence of the stimulus code designated as positive by the task rule with the positive-polarity right response code.

摘要

当通过左右按键将数字分类为奇数或偶数时,采用偶数-右/奇数-左的映射方式比相反的映射方式表现更好。这种反应编码的语言标记性关联(MARC)效应被归因于刺激和反应编码的语言标记性之间的兼容性。在两项实验中,参与者根据奇数-偶数奇偶规则或3的倍数规则,对阿拉伯数字或数字单词3、4、8和9进行按键操作,这两种规则对每个刺激产生相同的按键反应。对于两种刺激模式,使用奇数-偶数规则都能获得MARC效应,但使用3的倍数规则时该效应往往会反转。对于右侧反应,反转是完全的,但任务规则对左侧反应影响很小。这些结果与以下观点一致,即MARC效应及其反转是由任务规则指定为正的刺激编码与正极性右侧反应编码的对应关系所导致的。

相似文献

1
When is an odd number not odd? Influence of task rule on the MARC effect for numeric classification.奇数在何时不是奇数?任务规则对数字分类的MARC效应的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):832-42. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.832.
2
Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect.SNARC效应与MARC效应(反应编码的语言标记性)的符号调制。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Jul;57(5):835-63. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000512.
3
Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.数量和空间映射向奇偶判断 SNARC 效应的转移。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1506-21. doi: 10.1037/a0017257.
4
Embodied markedness of parity? Examining handedness effects on parity judgments.产次的具身标记性?探究利手对产次判断的影响。
Psychol Res. 2015 Nov;79(6):963-77. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0626-9. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
5
Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.极性对应上的好坏约束解释了反应编码的空间-数字关联效应(SNARC)和反应编码的标记性关联效应(MARC)。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(3):482-94. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1055283. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
6
The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.胎次、身体大小和数量大小在数字认知中的作用:对SNARC效应的再探讨。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Jan;71(1):143-55. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.1.143.
7
Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation.从阿拉伯数字中提取奇偶性和大小:数字处理与心理表征的发展变化
J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Dec;74(4):286-308. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2518.
8
Developing access to number magnitude: a study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds.发展对数的大小的认知:一项关于7至9岁儿童空间数字反应联合效应的研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Oct;101(2):99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
9
Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.刺激特征和指令对反应编码、选择及抑制的影响:来自任务转换下重复效应的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Oct;61(10):1573-600. doi: 10.1080/17470210701643397.
10
Effect of an initiating action on the up-right/down-left advantage for vertically arrayed stimuli and horizontally arrayed responses.起始动作对垂直排列刺激和水平排列反应的右上/左下优势的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Apr;27(2):472-84.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of cognitive control in the interaction of the SNARC and MARC effects.认知控制在SNARC效应和MARC效应交互作用中的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 17;13(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02692-2.
2
Linguistic markedness and body specificity in parity judgments: evidence from a go/no-go task.在生育判断中语言标记和身体特异性:来自 Go/No-Go 任务的证据。
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov 20;89(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02062-4.
3
A systematic investigation reveals that Ishihara et al.'s (2008) STEARC effect only emerges when time is directly assessed.
一项系统的研究表明,只有当时间被直接评估时,Ishihara 等人(2008 年)的 STEARC 效应才会出现。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 5;12(1):18822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23411-6.
4
The SNARC Effect in Chinese Numerals: Do Visual Properties of Characters and Hand Signs Influence Number Processing?中文数字中的空间数字反应编码联合效应:字符和手势的视觉属性会影响数字处理吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e0163897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163897. eCollection 2016.
5
Polarity correspondence effect between loudness and lateralized response set.响度与侧向反应集之间的极性对应效应。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 22;6:683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00683. eCollection 2015.
6
Arbitrary numbers counter fair decisions: trails of markedness in card distribution.任意数字不利于公平决策:卡片分发中的标记性痕迹。
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 20;6:240. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00240. eCollection 2015.
7
Embodied markedness of parity? Examining handedness effects on parity judgments.产次的具身标记性?探究利手对产次判断的影响。
Psychol Res. 2015 Nov;79(6):963-77. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0626-9. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
8
Finding the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) in signed numbers: notational effects in accessing number representation.探究有符号数字中反应编码的空间-数字联合效应(SNARC):数字表征提取中的符号效应
Funct Neurol. 2012 Jul-Sep;27(3):177-85.