• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[倾向评分:意义与局限]

[Propensity score: interest and limits].

作者信息

Kwiatkowski Fabrice, Slim Karem, Verrelle Pierre, Chamorey Emmanuel, Kramar Andrew

机构信息

Unité de recherche clinique, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 rue Montalembert, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand.

出版信息

Bull Cancer. 2007 Jul;94(7):680-6.

PMID:17723950
Abstract

Propensity score, an indicator of the propensity to get one treatment among two (or more), is encountered in non randomized studies (prospective or retrospective). It is calculated after the research of predictive factors for treatment attribution, and corresponds to the probability to receive one of the treatments conditional to variables observed before treatment. This probability is usually generated thanks to a logistic regression equation. This score sums up by itself a whole set of parameters. It can be used as cofactor in other multivariate models that aim to evaluate with a reduced risk of confusion, the impact of therapeutical modalities on such end-points as survival, morbidity, secondary effects or quality of life. It appears very convenient to realize matching or stratification in order to compare these end-points among resulting subgroups. Despite this advantage that enables to obtain a posteriori similar subgroups, this method cannot pretend to reach the level of evidence of randomized trials, because absence of bias is never guaranteed. Apart from this major methodological weakness, propensity score appears less useful in studies provided with a large population, since in such cases, multivariate models can include enough covariates to produce in a secure way stable conclusions. When samples are small, this score remains interesting although its reliability, once more, depends on sample size and conclusions need nuances. Examples are included to illustrate the topic.

摘要

倾向得分是在非随机研究(前瞻性或回顾性)中遇到的一种指标,用于表示在两种(或更多种)治疗中接受某种治疗的倾向。它是在研究治疗分配的预测因素后计算得出的,对应于在治疗前观察到的变量条件下接受其中一种治疗的概率。这种概率通常通过逻辑回归方程生成。该得分本身总结了一整套参数。它可以用作其他多变量模型中的协变量,这些模型旨在以降低混淆风险的方式评估治疗方式对生存、发病率、副作用或生活质量等终点的影响。为了在所得亚组之间比较这些终点,进行匹配或分层似乎非常方便。尽管这种方法具有能够获得事后相似亚组的优势,但它不能声称达到随机试验的证据水平,因为永远无法保证没有偏差。除了这个主要的方法学弱点外,倾向得分在样本量较大的研究中似乎用处较小,因为在这种情况下,多变量模型可以包含足够的协变量,以可靠的方式得出稳定的结论。当样本量较小时,这个得分仍然很有意义,尽管它的可靠性再次取决于样本量,并且结论需要细微差别。文中包含了示例以说明该主题。

相似文献

1
[Propensity score: interest and limits].[倾向评分:意义与局限]
Bull Cancer. 2007 Jul;94(7):680-6.
2
[Propensity score: A credible alternative to randomization?].[倾向评分:随机化的可靠替代方法?]
Bull Cancer. 2016 Jan;103(1):113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
3
Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.在倾向得分进行多对一匹配时评估测量的基线协变量中的平衡。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1218-25. doi: 10.1002/pds.1674.
4
Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.倾向得分法在治疗组与非随机对照组比较中减少偏倚的应用
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b.
5
Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.调整上市后早期阶段的混杂因素:超越逻辑回归模型
Epidemiology. 2016 Jan;27(1):133-42. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000388.
6
Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.在使用倾向得分进行协变量调整来估计治疗效果时,倾向得分模型的拟合优度诊断。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1202-17. doi: 10.1002/pds.1673.
7
Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.对干扰参数进行有针对性的估计以获得有效的统计推断。
Int J Biostat. 2014;10(1):29-57. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0038.
8
Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.存在多种混杂因素时,疾病风险评分、倾向评分和传统多变量结局回归的表现。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 1;174(5):613-20. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr143. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
9
[What are the propensity scores?].[倾向评分是什么?]
Rev Med Chil. 2016 Mar;144(3):364-70. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872016000300012.
10
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks.用于估计相对风险的不同倾向评分方法的性能。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):537-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.011. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing the issue of bias in observational studies: Using instrumental variables and a quasi-randomization trial in an ESME research project.解决观察性研究中的偏倚问题:在 ESME 研究项目中使用工具变量和准随机化试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 15;16(9):e0255017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255017. eCollection 2021.
2
Re-treatment With Adjuvant Radioactive Iodine Does Not Improve Recurrence-Free Survival of Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.辅助放射性碘再治疗并不能提高分化型甲状腺癌患者的无复发生存率。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Sep 27;10:671. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00671. eCollection 2019.
3
Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with diabetes: protocol for a nested case-control study.
糖尿病患者季节性流感疫苗接种的有效性:一项巢式病例对照研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e016023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016023.
4
Effectiveness and tolerance of single tablet versus once daily multiple tablet regimens as first-line antiretroviral therapy - Results from a large french multicenter cohort study.单片制剂与每日一次多片制剂作为一线抗逆转录病毒疗法的有效性和耐受性——一项大型法国多中心队列研究的结果
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170661. eCollection 2017.
5
Impact of chest radiography for children with lower respiratory tract infection: a propensity score approach.胸部X线检查对下呼吸道感染儿童的影响:倾向评分法
PLoS One. 2014 May 2;9(5):e96189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096189. eCollection 2014.
6
Evaluation of different approaches for confounding in nonrandomised observational data: a case-study of antipsychotics treatment.非随机观察性数据中混杂因素的不同处理方法评估:抗精神病药物治疗的案例研究
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Aug;50(6):711-20. doi: 10.1007/s10597-014-9723-x. Epub 2014 Apr 3.